Browse

Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний нэгдүгээр биеийн олон тооны төлөөний үгсийн тухай ажигласан нь
Observations on the first person plural pronoun in Modern Mongolian

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors
Вонсү, )Ю.
Issue Date
2015-08
Publisher
한국몽골학회
Citation
몽골학 No.42, pp. 133-156
Keywords
Орчин цагийн монгол хэлний нэгдүгээр биеийн олон тооны төлөөний үгсийн тухай ажигласан нь인문학First person plural pronoun일인칭복수대명사Modern Mongolian현대몽골어Inclusiveness포함성Exclusiveness배제성Historical developments역사적 변화
Abstract
This paper tries to identify all the first person plural pronoun morphemes in Modern Mongolian spoken in Mongolia. For this purpose, observations were made on various data, including the articles, columns, and comments found in the Mongolian internet media, blog posts, and Twitter feeds. Transcriptions of some 600 interviews provided by The Oral History of Twentieth Century Mongolia, University of Cambridge served as another major data for this research. Attempts were made to determine if there is any functional, semantic, or pragmatic distinction among the morphemes /biden/, /bidan/, /bid nar/, /bidnuus/, /bidnüüs/, /bidnuud/, /bidnüüd/, /byadan/, /byad nar/, /bid hed/, /man/, /manuus/, /manuud/, /manai/, /manai hed/, /man/, /manius/, /maniud/, and /man hed/. The declension forms of each morpheme are presented in the tables. Attention was paid to know if the speakers age, gender, ethnic origin, education, or the native place has any influence in choosing any specific morpheme. The introduction to the derivational relationships among the morphemes, as well as the difference between the /manai/, the special genitive form of the morpheme /man/ and the /manai/, the underlying representation of the morpheme /manai/ is explained. Over a hundred sentences were chosen from the data and altered in average five to ten different sentences to investigate the native speakers intuition for the choosing any proper morpheme, or to find the possible nuance among the morphemes. Frequency in the data was compared among the morphemes. Special attention was paid to the genitive forms of /biden/ and /man/ to determine if a distinction exists between about the inclusiveness and exclusiveness. Historical developments were observed on /bidan/ and /man/ from Middle Mongolian to Modern Mongolian.
ISSN
12297097
Language
mn
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/135276
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:
College of Humanities (인문대학)Institute of Humanities (인문학연구원)Journal Papers (저널논문_인문학연구원)
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse