Publications

Detailed Information

Germanys Reconciliation Process: Political Agency towards an Ideal-type of Reconciliation : 독일의 화해 과정: 이상적 형태의 화해를 위한 정치적 행위자

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisorSong, Jiyeoun-
dc.contributor.author베네딕트-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T07:48:47Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T07:48:47Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.other000000145813-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/137545-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 국제대학원 국제학과(국제지역학전공), 2017. 8. Song, Jiyeoun.-
dc.description.abstractWhy could Germany reconcile its relations with the countries that were victims of Nazism, even after the first elected conservative government of West Germany pursued policies that aimed at drawing a finish line? Previous explanations can be divided into three groups: cultural, structural, and agency. In this thesis, I develop the latter explanation by extending the category of political agents to intellectuals who have greatly contributed to the political discourse on reconciliation in Germany. Moreover, I examine whether Germanys political agents have pushed towards reconciliation that resembles an ideal-type. Based on this examination, I argue that the Germany could reconcile its relations with the countries that were victims of Nazism because it always had political agents, especially intellectuals and Federal Presidents, who not only opposed opportunistic policies of the government, but also helped to establish and uphold a normative boundary.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsI. Introduction 1
II. The Analytical Framework 8
1. Prior Explanations to German and Japanese Reconciliation 8
1-1. Cultural Explanations 8
1-2. Structural Explanations 16
1-3. Political Agency Explanations 21
2. Defining an Ideal-Type of Reconciliation 23
III. A Finish Line for a Functioning Democracy 28
1. The Office of Military Government, United States (1945-1949) 28
1-1. The Question of German Guilt 28
2. The Adenauer Era (1949-63) 34
2-1. Denazification Revised 34
2-2. Prosecution Revised 40
2-3. Material Reparations to Israel 42
2-4. Speaking about the Nazi Crimes 46
2-5. What Does Coming to Terms with the Past Mean? 48
2-6. The Slow Awakening 53
IV. Establishing and Upholding a Normative Boundary 57
1. From Erhard to Kiesinger (1963-69) 57
1-1. Questioning the Statute of Limitation 57
1-2. Education After Auschwitz 60
2. The Social Democrat Era – Brandt & Schmidt (1969-82) 62
2-1. The New Ostpolitik 62
2-2. Brandts Genuflection 63
3. The Helmut Kohl Era (1982-1998) 68
3-1. A New Politics of Historical Memory 68
3-2. Weizsäckers Commemoration Speech 70
3-3. The Historikerstreit 72
4. The New Millennium – From Schröder to Merkel (1998~) 76
4-1. Depoliticizing Reconciliation 76
V. Conclusion 79
VI. Bibliography 82
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1660700 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 국제대학원-
dc.subjectReconciliation-
dc.subjectPolitical Agency-
dc.subjectIntellectuals-
dc.subjectGermany-
dc.subject.ddc307-
dc.titleGermanys Reconciliation Process: Political Agency towards an Ideal-type of Reconciliation-
dc.title.alternative독일의 화해 과정: 이상적 형태의 화해를 위한 정치적 행위자-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation국제대학원 국제학과(국제지역학전공)-
dc.date.awarded2017-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share