Publications

Detailed Information

The Role of Different Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatments for Inactivation of Bacteria Biofilmson Stainless Steel

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor조철훈-
dc.contributor.author안정연-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-31T07:52:06Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-31T07:52:06Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.other000000145686-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/137586-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 농업생명과학대학 농생명공학부, 2017. 8. 조철훈.-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to investigate the optimum conditions of inactivation efficiency of various atmospheric pressure plasma (APP) treatment methods to biofilms and furthermore, the inactivation mechanism of optimized APP treatment was investigated. Listeria monocytogenes (Gram-positive bacteria) and Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Gram-negative bacteria) biofilms were formed on stainless steel, widely used material for various utensils in food industry. Then, the biofilms were treated by four different methods of plasma treatment for 10 min: 1) direct plasma treatment (Direct-P)-
dc.description.abstract2) plasma treatment dissolved in distilled water (DW-P), 3) 100 ppm of sodium chloride (NaCl-P), and 4) 100 ppm of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl-P). No significant difference was shown in the reduction number (log CFU/cm2) of L. monocytogenes biofilms by different plasma treatment methods. However, the reduction number of E. coli O157:H7 was effective in order as NaOCl-P (3.45 log) > Direct-P (2.26 log) = NaCl-P (2.07 log) = DW-P (1.96 log). In NaOCl-P environment, the concentrations of hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite were the highest among the different methods of plasma treatment, indicating that these chemical species play a major role in inactivation of pathogenic bacteria in biofilms. Therefore, NaOCl-P is the optimum plasma treatment methods for inactivation of E. coli O157:H7 biofilms formed on stainless steel. In addition, the merit of using lower concentration of NaOCl than typical practice in industry can be achieved.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsⅠ. General introduction 1
Ⅱ. Literature Review 5
1. Biofilm 5
1.1. What is biofilm? 5
1.2. Mechanism of biofilm formation 5
1.3. Biofilm-forming foodborne pathogens 8
1.4. Biofilm in animal origin food industry 10
1.5. Biofilm control 13
1.5.1. Conventional methods 13
1.5.2. Novel methods 16
2. Plasma 18
2.1. What is plasma? 18
2.2. Mechanism of microbial inactivation by plasma 19
2.3. Application of plasma treatment 20
2.4. Plasma treated water (PTW) 25

Ⅲ. Effect of different atmospheric pressure plasma treatment methods on pathogenic bacteria in biofilm and its inactivation mechanism 28
Abstract 28
Introduction 30
Materials and Methods 33
Results and Discussion 41
Conclusion 66
Ⅳ. Literature Cited 67
Ⅴ. Summary in Korean 85
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1359613 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectEscherichia coli O157:H7-
dc.subjectListeria monocytogenes-
dc.subjectBiofilm-
dc.subjectAtmospheric pressure plasma-
dc.subjectInactivation mechanism-
dc.subjectChemical species-
dc.subject.ddc630-
dc.titleThe Role of Different Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatments for Inactivation of Bacteria Biofilmson Stainless Steel-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation농업생명과학대학 농생명공학부-
dc.date.awarded2017-08-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share