Publications

Detailed Information

Converting and Disputing the Role of Traditional Cultural Institutions in Cameroons Cross River Basin, 1916‒1961

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKah, Henry Kam-
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-08T06:17:48Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-08T06:17:48Z-
dc.date.issued2017-11-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Journal of Peacebuilding, Vol.5 No.2, pp. 267-287-
dc.identifier.issn2288-2693 (print)-
dc.identifier.issn2288-2707 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/138434-
dc.description.abstractThis article probes the British and missionary misinterpretation and presentation of the role of Ekpe, Nfam, and Obasinjom cultural institutions as irrelevant in the governance of people of the Cross River Basin of Cameroon. The British colonial enterprise in the area was sustained on a seemingly conscious yet uncritical effort to label these institutions as mainly ceremonial and food consuming in nature. This impression notwithstanding, these institutions remained popular and continuously spread into the nooks and crannies of the Cross River Basin of Cameroon and beyond.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherThe Institute for Peace and Unification Studies, Seoul National University-
dc.subjectcultural institutions-
dc.subjectmisrepresentation-
dc.subjectBritish colonialism-
dc.subjectCross River-
dc.subjectCameroon-
dc.titleConverting and Disputing the Role of Traditional Cultural Institutions in Cameroons Cross River Basin, 1916‒1961-
dc.typeSNU Journal-
dc.identifier.doi10.18588/201711.00a032-
dc.citation.journaltitleAsian Journal of Peacebuilding-
dc.citation.endpage287-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.pages267-287-
dc.citation.startpage267-
dc.citation.volume5-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share