Publications

Detailed Information

Relationship between macroseismic intensity and instrumental seismic intensity for Korean earthquakes : 국내 지진에서 거시진도와 계기진도의 관계

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor김호경-
dc.contributor.author김병조-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-29T03:08:06Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-29T03:08:06Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-
dc.identifier.other000000149399-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/141328-
dc.description학위논문 (석사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 공과대학 건설환경공학부, 2018. 2. 김호경.-
dc.description.abstractIt is important to assess damage by region and to communicate the information with relevant organizations in earthquake response. Timely and reliable information minimize public confusion and reduce unnecessary effort. Seismic intensity is the representative information related to earthquake damage. It is classified into macroseismic intensity and instrumental seismic intensity.
Korea is in different earthquake environment from overseas. Therefore, it is required to improve seismic intensity assessment system suitable for Korea. It should be improved in two aspects. One is related to improving the description of macroseismic intensity, and the other is related to developing the macroseismic-intensity- prediction model. The former is researched separately, and the latter was researched in this thesis.
Correlation analysis between macroseismic intensity(observed MMI) and 4 kinds of instrumental intensities were performed. Housner spectral intensity showed the highest correlation coefficient and was used for regression analysis to develop MMI prediction model. Proposed model provides more improved information than before, despite its limited applicability(MMI < 6 and epicentral distance 140km). Most cases will be in that condition, because Korean earthquakes are usually small-to-moderate. Stronger earthquake data of overseas, which are in intra-plate similar to Korea, would help to supplement the model in the future research.
-
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction 1
2. Seismic intensity 5
2.1 Introduction 5
2.2 Kinds of macroseismic intensity 7
2.3 Kinds of instrumental seismic intensity 10
2.3.1 PGA 11
2.3.2 Housner spectral intensity 11
2.3.3 Arias intensity 12
2.3.4 JMA seismic intensity 13
2.3.5 Direction problem 16
3. Correlation analysis 17
3.1 Data 17
3.2 Correlation analysis 19
4. Regression analysis 24
4.1 Proposing a MMI prediction model 24
4.2 Comparison to previous research 31
5. Applications to Pohang earthquake(2017) 33
6. Discussion 37
7. Conclusion 40
Appendix 41
1. Modified Mercalli Intensity of 1931 41
2. European Marcoseismic Scale 45
3. JMA seismic intensity scale 50
4. Status of KMAs observatory 52
References 54
-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1787486 bytes-
dc.format.mediumapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectSeismic intensity-
dc.subjectmacroseismic intensity-
dc.subjectinstrumental seismic intensity-
dc.subjectMMI-
dc.subjectearthquake response-
dc.subjectintra-plate-
dc.subjecthousner spectral intensity-
dc.subject.ddc624-
dc.titleRelationship between macroseismic intensity and instrumental seismic intensity for Korean earthquakes-
dc.title.alternative국내 지진에서 거시진도와 계기진도의 관계-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorByoung-Jo, Kim-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.contributor.affiliation공과대학 건설환경공학부-
dc.date.awarded2018-02-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share