Publications

Detailed Information

LYL1 gene amplification predicts poor survival of patients with uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma: analysis of the Cancer genome atlas data

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Se Ik-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ji Won-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Nara-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hee Seung-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Hyun Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jae-Weon-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Noh Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Yong-Sang-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Jeong-Sun-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-30T01:31:26Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-30T10:35:32Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-02-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Cancer, 18(1):494ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/142637-
dc.description.abstractBackground
Somatic amplifications of the LYL1 gene are relatively common occurrences in patients who develop uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) as opposed to other cancers. This study was undertaken to determine whether such genetic alterations affect survival outcomes of UCEC.

Methods
In 370 patients with UCEC, we analysed clinicopathologic characteristics and corresponding genomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Patients were stratified according to LYL1 gene status, grouped as amplification or non-amplification. Heightened levels of cancer-related genes expressed in concert with LYL1 amplification were similarly investigated through differentially expressed gene and gene set enrichment analyses. Factors associated with survival outcomes were also identified.

Results
Somatic LYL1 gene amplification was observed in 22 patients (5.9%) with UCEC. Patients displaying amplification (vs. non-amplification) were significantly older at the time of diagnosis and more often were marked by non-endometrioid, high-grade, or advanced disease. In survival analysis, the amplification subset showed poorer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (3-year PFS: 34.4% vs. 79.9%, P = 0.031; 5-year OS: 25.1% vs. 84.9%, P = 0.014). However, multivariate analyses adjusted for tumor histologic type, grade, and stage did not confirm LYL1 gene amplification as an independent prognostic factor for either PFS or OS. Nevertheless, MAPK, WNT, and cell cycle pathways were significantly enriched by LYL1 gene amplification (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, and P = 0.004, respectively).

Conclusions
Despite not being identified as an independent prognostic factor in UCEC, LYL1 gene amplification is associated with other poor prognostic factors and correlated with upregulation of cancer-related pathways.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBioMed Centralko_KR
dc.subjectEndometrial Neoplasmsko_KR
dc.subjectThe Cancer Genome Atlassko_KR
dc.subjectLYL1sko_KR
dc.subjectSurvival analysissko_KR
dc.subjectGene expression pattern analysisko_KR
dc.subjectGene set enrichment analysisko_KR
dc.titleLYL1 gene amplification predicts poor survival of patients with uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma: analysis of the Cancer genome atlas datako_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김세익-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이지원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이나라-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이마리아-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김희승-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor정현훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박노현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor송용상-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor서정순-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-018-4429-z-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).-
dc.date.updated2018-05-06T03:41:28Z-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share