Publications

Detailed Information

Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease diagnosed by two methods: a prospective cohort study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyung-Jun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong Hyuk-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Soon Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sung A-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Myoung Sil-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Sun Mi-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jinwoo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chang-Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Sung Koo-
dc.contributor.authorYim, Jae-Joon-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T04:45:26Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-26T13:46:27Z-
dc.date.issued2019-05-24-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Infectious Diseases. 19(1):468ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2334-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/156020-
dc.description.abstractBackground
Microbiological criteria for diagnosing nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) include positive culture results from at least two separately expectorated sputum specimens or one bronchial washing or lavage. However, the clinical similarities and differences between patients diagnosed by these two methods remain unclear. We compared clinical features and prognoses of patients with NTM-PD diagnosed from both specimen types.

Methods
We analysed data from patients who participated in the Seoul National University Hospital NTM-PD cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01616745). Baseline demographics, symptoms, radiographic findings, disease progression, and treatment responses were summarized and compared between patients diagnosed from sputum specimens and patients diagnosed from bronchoscopic specimens.

Results
Three hundred forty-seven patients were included in the analyses. Of these, 279 (80.4%) were diagnosed from two separately expectorated sputum specimens, and 68 (19.6%) were diagnosed from bronchoscopic specimens. Patients diagnosed from sputum specimens had more frequent and severe cough, sputum, postnasal drip, and high St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire scores. However, the extent and severity of the radiographic lesions, disease progression, and treatment responses were similar for both groups. Further analysis based on the following three groups (sputum culture positive, sputum culture negative/bronchoscopy, and scanty sputum/bronchoscopy groups) suggested that the scanty sputum/bronchoscopy group appeared to have the worst prognosis in terms of both time to progression and time to culture conversion.

Conclusions
Although some symptoms and quality of life were worse in patients with NTM-PD diagnosed from sputum specimens, their prognoses were similar to those of patients diagnosed by bronchoscopic specimen. We recommend bronchoscopic sampling for patients in whom NTM-PD is suspected clinically or radiographically, especially those who have no or scanty sputum.
ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by grant from the Seoul National University College of Medicine Research Fund, year 2017 (800–20170102). The funder did not have any role in the studyko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBioMed Centralko_KR
dc.subjectClinical medicineko_KR
dc.subjectCohort studiesko_KR
dc.subjectDiagnosisko_KR
dc.subjectNontuberculous mycobacteriako_KR
dc.subjectProgressionko_KR
dc.titleNontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease diagnosed by two methods: a prospective cohort studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김형준-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이종혁-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤순호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김성아-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김명실-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최선미-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이진우-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이창훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor한성구-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임재-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12879-019-4078-0-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).-
dc.date.updated2019-05-26T05:05:23Z-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share