Publications

Detailed Information

Comparison of the regeneration of cartilage and the clinical outcomes after the open wedge high tibial osteotomy with or without microfracture: a retrospective case control study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, O-Sung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorMok, Su Jung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yong Seuk-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T07:15:42Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-26T16:17:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 20(1):267ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2474-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/156034-
dc.description.abstractBackground
It is unclear whether postoperative outcomes are associated with the cartilage regeneration after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) combined with microfracture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the regeneration of the articular cartilage, radiologic, and clinical outcomes after OWHTO with and without microfracture.

Methods
Eighty-seven patients who underwent OWHTO from 2014 to 2015 were retrospectively included in this study. Fifty-seven OWHTOs with microfracture on medial femoral condyle (MFC) (group 1) and 30 OWHTOs without microfracture (group 2) were compared at a mean 2-year follow-up. The regeneration of the articular cartilage was evaluated using International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade on the second-look arthroscopy and the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and Ahlbäck grade were evaluated. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) scores and the Knee Society (KS).

Results
The articular cartilage in the MFC were regenerated in 67.8% of group 1 (43/57) and 58.6% of group 2 (16/30), respectively (p = 0.014). However, change of the ICRS grades of the medial tibial plateau, lateral and patellofemoral compartments showed no statistical difference between the groups. Total MOCART score in group 1 was superior to that in the group 2 at postoperative 2 years (41.8 ± 18.6 vs. 31.8 ± 19.8, p = 0.023). Regarding MOCART score, microfracture was only effective in the defect filling and integration to the border zone of the MFC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.035, respectively). Other radiologic and clinical outcomes showed no statistical differences between the groups.

Conclusion
Microfracture of the MFC during OWHTO only helped the filling of the degenerative cartilage defect and the integration of the cartilage with adjacent cartilage. However, the clinical and radiologic outcome could not be improved by mircrofracture in the OWHTO.
ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (NRF-2017R1D1A1A09000509)ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBioMed Centralko_KR
dc.subjectKneeko_KR
dc.subjectOpen wedge high tibial osteotomyko_KR
dc.subjectMicrofractureko_KR
dc.subjectCartilageko_KR
dc.subjectRegenerationko_KR
dc.titleComparison of the regeneration of cartilage and the clinical outcomes after the open wedge high tibial osteotomy with or without microfracture: a retrospective case control studyko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이오성-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이승훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor목수정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이용-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12891-019-2607-z-
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).-
dc.date.updated2019-06-02T06:13:58Z-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share