Publications

Detailed Information

Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a preliminary study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Soo Woong-
dc.contributor.authorPaick, Jae-Seung-
dc.contributor.authorKu, Ja Hyeon-
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-26T03:12:36Z-
dc.date.available2009-11-26T03:12:36Z-
dc.date.issued2006-12-29-
dc.identifier.citationUrol Int. 2007;78(1):58-62.en
dc.identifier.issn0042-1138 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?typ=pdf&file=000096936-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17192734-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/15749-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical effect of intermittent percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). METHODS: A total of 15 patients (10 women and 5 men, mean age 60.0 years, range 41-78) with CPP were enrolled in an open prospective clinical trial. The patients had 12 weekly outpatient treatment sessions, each lasting 30 min. All patients were evaluated by history, physical as well as urological examination, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and urgency, the International Prostate Symptom Score, and a 3-day frequency-volume chart. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of PTNS, 9 (60%) and 3 patients (30%) had an improvement of >50% and 25-50% in the VAS score for pain, respectively. Six patients (40%) ended up with a mean VAS <3. Mean VAS for pain changed from 8.1 +/- 0.2 at baseline to 4.1 +/- 0.6 after 12 weeks of treatment (p < 0.01). Mean VAS for urgency changed from 4.5 +/- 1.0 at baseline to 2.7 +/- 0.7 after 12 weeks of treatment (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant improvement in the International Prostate Symptom Score. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of voids and bladder volumes either. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that PTNS may improve pain symptoms for over half of the patients with CPP. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to verify these preliminary results.en
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherKargeren
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectChronic Diseaseen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectPelvic Pain/*therapyen
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Indexen
dc.subjectTranscutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/*methodsen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectTibial Nerve-
dc.titlePercutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a preliminary studyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김수웅-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor백재승-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor구자현-
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000096936-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share