Publications

Detailed Information

The different modalities of NGO life cycle in developing countries

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor김태균-
dc.contributor.authorMwesigwa Trichard Magingo-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-13T03:06:04Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-13T03:06:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.other000000161512-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/169523-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.snu.ac.kr/common/orgView/000000161512ko_KR
dc.description학위논문 (석사) -- 서울대학교 대학원 : 국제대학원 국제학과(국제지역학전공), 2020. 8. 김태균.-
dc.description.abstract이 연구는 NGO의 라이프 사이클의 다양한 양식과 그것이 우간다에서 NGO의 지속 가능성에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 조사하기 위해 시작되었습니다. 이 연구는 비교되고 조사 설계를 채택했으며 OURS와 Mariestopes Uganda 라이프 사이클의 다양한 양식을 비교했습니다. 규모, 운영 및 지속 가능성의 차이에 대한 이유를 설정하고 개발 도상국의 NGO를위한 개발 프로그램 구현을위한 정책 권장 사항을 제안합니다.
이 연구는 조직이 수명주기를 통해 위기의시기에 직면하여 조직의 생존에 변화, 적응 또는 심각한 위협을 초래한다는 사실을 확인했습니다. 이 연구는 수명주기 단계와 단계에서 NGO가 운영을 지속하고 지속 가능하게하려면 모든 단계에서 이용 가능한 기회를 활용하면서 위협을 관리하는 것이 필수적이라는 사실을 확인했습니다. 또한 NGO는 계획과 수명주기의 어느 단계에서 언제 그리고 어느 단계에서 다각화를 시작할 것인지 또는 결정하기 위해 사용 가능한 자원에 따라 매우 신중하게 결정해야합니다.
-
dc.description.abstractThe study set out to examine the different modalities of the NGOs life cycle and how they affect the sustainability of NGOs in Uganda. This study was comparative and adopted a survey design and compared the different modalities of OURS and Mariestopes Uganda life cycles. It establishes the reasons for the differences in size, operations and sustainability and suggests policy recommendations for development Programme implementation for NGOs in developing Countries.
The study established that through the lifecycles, organizations face periods of crises, which in turn lead to change, adaptation, or serious threats to the organizations survival. The study established that throughout the lifecycle stages and phases, it is imperative to manage the threats while taking advantage of the available opportunities at every stage if NGOs were to continue operation and become sustainable. Besides, NGOs need to determine very carefully depending on their plans, and available resources when and at which stage of their lifecycles to either specialize, or embark on diversification as these processes determined growth and continuity.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Background to the study 1
1.1.1 Historical Background 1
1.1.2 Conceptual Background 3
1.1.3 Theoretical background 5
1.1.4 Contextual Background 7
1.2 Statement of the Problem 10
1.3 Purpose of the study 12
1.4. Objectives of the study 12
1.5. Research Question 12
1.6 Hypothesis 13
1.7 Justification of the study 13
1.8 Significance of the Study 14
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 15
2.0 Introduction 15
2.1 An introduction to the NGO life cycle 15
2.2.2 Stage 2: Survival/ Early Growth 22
2.2.3 Stage 3- Maturity 28
2.2.4 Stage 4- Renewal/Stagnation/Crisis 31
2.2.5 The 5th Stage- Decline/Close out/Closure 34
2.3 Implications for growth phases 37
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY 41
3.0 Introduction 41
3.1 Research Design 41
3.2 Study Population 42
3.2.1 Sample size and selection 42
3.2.2 Sampling techniques and procedure 44
3.3 Methods of Data Collection 44
3.3.1 Quantitative data collection methods: 45
3.3.2 Qualitative data collection methods 45
3.3.3 Document review 45
3.4 Data collection instruments 46
3.5 Validity and Reliability 47
3.6 Procedure of Data Collection 48
3.7 Data Analysis 50
3.7.1 Qualitative analysis 50
3.7.2 Quantitative Analysis 51
3.7.3 Measurement of variables 51
CHAPTER FOUR: PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS INTERPRETATION AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 52
4.0 Introduction 52
4.1 Response rate 52
4.2 Demographic Composition of the Sample 54
4.2.1 Age 54
4.2.2 Time Worked at the NGO (both OURS and Mariestopes) 56
4.2.3 Education Level 57
4.3 Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Findings of the Study 58
4.3.1 Stage one (start-up) of NGO Lifecycle 58
4.3.2 Stage two: The Early Growth/survival phase of NGO Lifecycle 68
4.3.4 Stage three: The Maturity phase of the NGO Lifecycle (7-30 years) 83
4.3.5 Stage Four: Crisis, Stagnation, and Decline (2-5 years) 95
4.3.6 Stage Five: Decline/Close out/Closure 106
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 120
5.0 Introduction 120
5.1 Demographic Composition of the Sample 120
5.2 Summary of the findings of the Study 121
5.3 Conclusions 126
5.3.1 Stage one (start-up) 126
5.3.2 Stage two: The Early Growth/survival phase of NGO Lifecycle 128
5.3.3 Stage three: The Maturity phase of the NGO Lifecycle (7-30 years) 129
5.3.4 Stage Four: Crisis, Stagnation, and Decline (2-5 years) 131
5.3.5 Stage Five: Decline/Close out/Closure 133
5.4 Recommendations 134
5.5 Areas for further research 135
REFERENCES 136
APPENDIX I
-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectLifecycle-
dc.subjectNGOs-
dc.subjectModalities-
dc.subjectSustainability-
dc.subject.ddc307-
dc.titleThe different modalities of NGO life cycle in developing countries-
dc.titlea comparison of OURS and Mariestopes in Uganda-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.typeDissertation-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor마징고 트리챠드-
dc.contributor.department국제대학원 국제학과(국제지역학전공)-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.date.awarded2020-08-
dc.identifier.uciI804:11032-000000161512-
dc.identifier.holdings000000000043▲000000000048▲000000161512▲-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share