Publications

Detailed Information

직업복귀한 산재노동자의 소득에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구 : A Study on Factors Affecting Income of Workers Returned to Work
직업복귀유형, 장해 조기수용 및 재활서비스 요인을 중심으로

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor엄석진-
dc.contributor.author이상민-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-13T04:12:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-13T04:12:23Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.other000000161825-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/170941-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.snu.ac.kr/common/orgView/000000161825ko_KR
dc.description학위논문 (석사) -- 서울대학교 대학원 : 행정대학원 공기업정책학과, 2020. 8. 엄석진.-
dc.description.abstract본 연구는 요양종결한 산재장해인의 삶의 질 지표 중 객관적 지표라 할 수 있는 소득을 대상으로 하였다. 구체적으로 직업복귀 유형(원직복귀,타직장재취업,창업), 자아존중감이나 자기효능감, 근 로복지공단의 재활서비스 수혜여부와 직업복귀 후 소득변화량간의 인과관계를 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 산재보험패널조사 데이터 (2013~2017)를 바탕으로 고정효과 모형과 성향점수매칭추정법의 분석모형을 통해 살펴본 독립변수와 종속변수와의 관계는 다음과 같이 분석되었다. 직장에 복귀한 유형에 있어 재해당시 소속된 원직장에 복귀한 경우가 다른 경우에 비해 소득변화량에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설과 재활서비스를 제공한 경우가 그렇치 않은 경우보다 소득 변화량에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설 이 채택될 통계적 근거가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 자아존중 감과 자기효능감의 정도가 직업복귀 후 소득변화량에 정(+)의 영 향을 미칠 것이라는 가설은 통계적 지지를 얻지 못해 기각되었다.-
dc.description.abstractThis study have a purpose to search the indicators of quality of life for workers with disabilities who have finished medical treatment. This paper was written to analyze the causal relationship between the types of return to work, early acceptance of disability and whether to receive rehabilitation services. The analysis model of the propensity score matching estimation method was used in this study. The hypothesis that returning to the original workplace at the time of the disaster will have a more positive effect on income change than other cases, and the hypothesis that providing rehabilitation services will have a more positive effect on income change than not have a statistical basis to be adopted. Meanwhile, the hypothesis that the degree of self-esteem and self-efficacy will affect the amount of income change after returned to work was rejected due to lack of statistical support.-
dc.description.tableofcontents제 1 장 서론··································································· 1 제 1 절 연구의 배경 및 목적·············································· 1제 2 절 연구의 대상과 범위················································ 2제 3 절 연구의 방법····························································· 3제 2 장 이론적 논의 및 선행연구 검토···················· 4 제 1 절 산재노동자의 삶의 질············································ 4 1. 삶의 질 「객관적 지표」로서의 소득·································· 5 2. 삶의 질 「주관적 지표」로서의 자아존중감······················ 7 3. 삶의 질 「주관적 지표」로서의 자기효능감······················ 8 4. 자기효능감과 장해수용························································ 10 제 2 절 산재보험 재활사업과 직업복귀···························· 13 1. 산재보험 재활사업······························································· 13 2. 재활사업의 운영체계···························································· 14 3. 산재노동자 직업복귀···························································· 19 제 3 절 선행 연구의 검토··················································· 22 1. 취업영향요인으로서의 제도적 환경·································· 22 2. 산재장해인과 선천성 장해인의 차이점···························· 23 3. 재해이후 취업력에 영향을 주는 구체적 요인················· 24 4. 장해수용과 자기효능감 및 자아존중감과의 관계··········· 25 5. 선행연구와의 차별성···························································· 27
제 3 장 연구설계························································· 31 제 1 절 연구모형 및 가설설정············································31 제 2 절 변수설정···································································33 1. 인적 요인··············································································· 37 2. 직업요인과 환경요인···························································· 37 3. 장해에 대한 조기수용 정도················································ 38 4. 소득························································································· 38 제 3 절 자료의 수집 및 분석 방법····································39 1. 패널조사대상의 선정···························································· 39 2. 설문지 구성··········································································· 42 3. 분석방법················································································· 43
제 4 장 통계분석 및 가설검증·································· 45 제 1 절 기초통계분석···························································45 1. 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성·············································· 45 2. 기술통계분석········································································· 46 제 2 절 측정도구의 타당성 및 신뢰성 검증····················49 1. 문항의 신뢰도 분석····························································· 49 2. 변수들간의 상관관계 분석·················································· 51 제 3 절 가설검증···································································52 1. 고정효과모형 및 성향점수매칭추정법 분석····················· 52 2. 직업복귀유형의 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··········· 55 3. 장해에 대한 수용과 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··· 60 4. 조절변수로서의 재활서비스 효과 분석···························· 61 제 4 절 해석 및 토론···························································63 1. 직업복귀유형과 객관적인 삶의 질···································· 63 2. 자아존중감, 자기효능감과 객관적인 삶의 질················· 66
제 5 장 결 론······························································· 68 제 1 절 요약···········································································68 제 2 절 재활서비스와 관련한 정책적 시사점··················69 1. 인적 요인··············································································· 37 2. 직업요인과 환경요인···························································· 37 3. 장해에 대한 조기수용 정도················································ 38 4. 소득························································································· 38 제 3 절 자료의 수집 및 분석 방법····································39 1. 패널조사대상의 선정···························································· 39 2. 설문지 구성··········································································· 42 3. 분석방법················································································· 43
제 4 장 통계분석 및 가설검증·································· 45 제 1 절 기초통계분석···························································45 1. 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성·············································· 45 2. 기술통계분석········································································· 46 제 2 절 측정도구의 타당성 및 신뢰성 검증····················49 1. 문항의 신뢰도 분석····························································· 49 2. 변수들간의 상관관계 분석·················································· 51 제 3 절 가설검증···································································52 1. 고정효과모형 및 성향점수매칭추정법 분석····················· 52 2. 직업복귀유형의 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··········· 55 3. 장해에 대한 수용과 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··· 60 4. 조절변수로서의 재활서비스 효과 분석···························· 61 제 4 절 해석 및 토론···························································63 1. 직업복귀유형과 객관적인 삶의 질···································· 63 2. 자아존중감, 자기효능감과 객관적인 삶의 질················· 66
제 5 장 결 론······························································· 68 제 1 절 요약···········································································68 제 2 절 재활서비스와 관련한 정책적 시사점··················69 1. 인적 요인··············································································· 37 2. 직업요인과 환경요인···························································· 37 3. 장해에 대한 조기수용 정도················································ 38 4. 소득························································································· 38 제 3 절 자료의 수집 및 분석 방법····································39 1. 패널조사대상의 선정···························································· 39 2. 설문지 구성··········································································· 42 3. 분석방법················································································· 43
제 4 장 통계분석 및 가설검증·································· 45 제 1 절 기초통계분석···························································45 1. 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성·············································· 45 2. 기술통계분석········································································· 46 제 2 절 측정도구의 타당성 및 신뢰성 검증····················49 1. 문항의 신뢰도 분석····························································· 49 2. 변수들간의 상관관계 분석·················································· 51 제 3 절 가설검증···································································52 1. 고정효과모형 및 성향점수매칭추정법 분석····················· 52 2. 직업복귀유형의 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··········· 55 3. 장해에 대한 수용과 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··· 60 4. 조절변수로서의 재활서비스 효과 분석···························· 61 제 4 절 해석 및 토론···························································63 1. 직업복귀유형과 객관적인 삶의 질···································· 63 2. 자아존중감, 자기효능감과 객관적인 삶의 질················· 66
제 5 장 결 론······························································· 68 제 1 절 요약···········································································68 제 2 절 재활서비스와 관련한 정책적 시사점··················69 제 3 절 연구의 한계 및 향후 과제····································75
참고문헌·········································································77 Abstract ········································································92
-
dc.language.isokor-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subject산업재해-
dc.subject산재장해인-
dc.subject소득-
dc.subject자아존중감-
dc.subject자기효능감-
dc.subject직업복귀-
dc.subjectIndustrial disaster-
dc.subjectworkers with disabilities-
dc.subjectincome-
dc.subjectself-esteem-
dc.subjectself-efficacy-
dc.subjectreturn to wor-
dc.subject.ddc352.266-
dc.title직업복귀한 산재노동자의 소득에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구-
dc.title.alternativeA Study on Factors Affecting Income of Workers Returned to Work-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.typeDissertation-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorLee Sangmin-
dc.contributor.department행정대학원 공기업정책학과-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.date.awarded2020-08-
dc.title.subtitle직업복귀유형, 장해 조기수용 및 재활서비스 요인을 중심으로-
dc.contributor.major공기업정책학-
dc.identifier.uciI804:11032-000000161825-
dc.identifier.holdings000000000043▲000000000048▲000000161825▲-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share