Publications

Detailed Information

Koreas Patterns of Trade

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJean Imbs-
dc.contributor.authorLaurent L. Pauwels-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T15:43:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-19T15:43:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationSeoul Journal of Economics, Vol.33 No.3, pp.333ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1225-0279-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/171373-
dc.description.abstractImbs and Pauwels (2020) introduce a measure of openness based on indirect trade. This paper illustrates the differences in the Korean patterns of trade when openness is measured using conventional measures based on direct trade, and when it is measured using this measure of indirect trade, labeled Export Intensity (EI). According to EI, the Republic of Korea (Korea) has been following an upward trend in openness since 2000 and even after 2010. This stands in contrast with most other large trading countries, including China and Germany. We show this is a reflection of Koreas integration with a few partner economies, most notably China. Vertical integration is considerable between Korea and China, in manufacturing and in services alike. The extent of this integration would be invisible on the basis of conventional measures of openness.ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherInstitute of Economic Research, Seoul National Universityko_KR
dc.subjectHigh Order Trade-
dc.subjectRepublic of Korea-
dc.subjectTrade partners-
dc.subjectSectors-
dc.titleKoreas Patterns of Tradeko_KR
dc.typeSNU Journalko_KR
dc.identifier.doi10.22904/sje.2020.33.3.004-
dc.citation.journaltitleSeoul Journal of Economicsko_KR
dc.citation.number3ko_KR
dc.citation.startpage333ko_KR
dc.citation.volume33ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share