Publications

Detailed Information

Adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation following gross total resection for atypical meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChun, Se-Woong-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyung Min-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Min-Sung-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Ho-
dc.contributor.authorDho, Yun-Sik-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Youngbeom-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin Wook-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yong Hwy-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chul-Kee-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T02:34:25Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-13T11:36:10Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-17-
dc.identifier.citationRadiation Oncology. 2021 Feb 17;16(1):34ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1748-717X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/174318-
dc.description.abstractBackground
The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on atypical meningioma (AM) underwent a gross total resection (GTR) remains unclear, showing conflicting results from various studies. The objective of this study was to perform an updated meta-analysis for observational studies to determine the effect of adjuvant RT after GTR on local recurrence and survival outcomes compared to observation after GTR.

Methods
PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify comparative studies that reported outcomes of adjuvant RT versus observation for AM patients after GTR. Local recurrence rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities related to RT were considered as outcomes of interest. Differences between two cohorts were estimated by calculating odds ratios (OR) for LR rate and hazard ratios (HR) for survival outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for meta-analysis, using R version 4.0.3 software. Included studies were appraised with the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-Randomized Studies. Outcome ratios were combined with the Mantel–Haenszel method and the inverse variance-weighted method, appropriately.

Results
Data from 30 studies involving 2904 patients (adjuvant RT: n = 737; observation: n = 2167) were eventually included. Significant reduction of local recurrence rate was seen in the adjuvant RT cohort compare to that in the observation cohort (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.36–0.68; p < 0.0001). Pooled HRs of PFS at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and > 5-year revealed that adjuvant RT was superior to observation. There was no significant difference in OS between the two cohorts during any period. Most toxicities were tolerable with grade 1 or 2. There was no documented grade 5 toxicity.

Conclusions
For AM patients who underwent GTR, evidence suggested that adjuvant RT could potentially decrease local recurrence and improve PFS better than observation.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBMCko_KR
dc.subjectAtypical meningioma-
dc.subjectGross total resection-
dc.subjectAdjuvant-
dc.subjectRadiotherapy-
dc.subjectPostoperative-
dc.titleAdjuvant radiotherapy versus observation following gross total resection for atypical meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysisko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor전세웅-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김경민-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김민성-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor도윤식-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor서영범-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김진욱-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김용희-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박철기-
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01759-9-
dc.citation.journaltitleRadiation Oncologyko_KR
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.date.updated2021-02-21T04:33:54Z-
dc.citation.number1ko_KR
dc.citation.startpage34ko_KR
dc.citation.volume16ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share