Publications

Detailed Information

A pilot study comparing three bend angles for lighted stylet intubation

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorWon, Dongwook-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jung-Man-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jiwon-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Jin-Young-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Kyong-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Jee-Eun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyerim-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Seoyoung-
dc.contributor.authorMin, Seong-Won-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-28T02:01:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-28T11:02:50Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-17-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Anesthesiology. 2021 May 17;21(1):148ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2253-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/174761-
dc.description.abstractBackground
For successful lighted stylet intubation, bending the lighted stylet with an appropriate angle is a prerequisite. The purpose of this study was to compare three different bend angles of 70, 80, and 90 degrees for lighted stylet intubation.

Methods
The patient trachea was intubated with a lighted stylet bent at 70, 80, or 90 degrees according to the randomly allocated groups (group I, II, and III, respectively). A lighted stylet combined with a tracheal tube was prepared with a bend angle of 70, 80, or 90 degrees according to the assigned group. We checked the success rate at the first attempt and overall success rate for the two attempts. Additionally, we measured search time, which was time from insertion of the bent union into the patient mouth to the start of advancing the tracheal tube while separating it from the lighted stylet, and evaluated postoperative sore throat (POST) at 2, 4, and 24h after the recovery from anesthesia.


Results
There was no statistically significant difference between group I, II, and III for success rate at first attempt (73.9 %, 88.2 %, and 94.7 %, respectively, p = 0.178), even though there was a trend of increasing success rate with increasing bend angles. For overall success rate, there was similar result to that in the first attempt between the groups I, II, and III (82.6 %, 94.1 %, and 100 %, respectively, p = 0.141). However, search time took significantly longer in group I than groups II and III (p < 0.001). When group II and III were compared for POST with numeric rating scale (0–10), it was significantly lower in group II than III at 2, 4h after the recovery (0.5 vs. 2.3, p = 0.016, and 0.4 vs. 1.8, p = 0.011, respectively).


Conclusions
The bend angle of the lighted stylet affected the time required for tracheal intubation and POST in our study. 80 and 90 degrees as a bend angle seem to be acceptable for clinicians in regard to success rate of lighted stylet intubation. Considering the success rate of lighted stylet intubation and POST, the bend angle of 80 degrees might be better than 70 and 90 degrees.


Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier
NCT03693235

, registered on 30 September 2018.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBMCko_KR
dc.subjectLighted stylet-
dc.subjectTracheal intubation-
dc.subjectPostoperative sore throat-
dc.titleA pilot study comparing three bend angles for lighted stylet intubationko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor원동욱-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이정만-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이지원-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor황진영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김태경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장지은-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김혜림-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor마서영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor민성원-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12871-021-01369-8-
dc.citation.journaltitleBMC Anesthesiologyko_KR
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.date.updated2021-05-23T03:16:06Z-
dc.citation.number1ko_KR
dc.citation.startpage148ko_KR
dc.citation.volume21ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share