Publications

Detailed Information

Brexit and the Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters of the EU : 브렉시트와 유럽연합의 형사사법공조

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor한정훈-
dc.contributor.author조규현-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30T06:07:10Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-30T06:07:10Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-
dc.identifier.other000000165151-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/176388-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dcollection.snu.ac.kr/common/orgView/000000165151ko_KR
dc.description학위논문 (석사) -- 서울대학교 대학원 : 국제대학원 국제학과(국제지역학전공), 2021. 2. 한정훈.-
dc.description.abstractThe United Kingdom withdrew from the European Union on January 31, 2020, following the result of the Brexit referendum held in 2016. Its withdrawal was expected to some extent, given that from the early stage of the EU, the UK was reluctant toward its creation as well as its development and that it had not fully supported EU policies as an active member even after it joined it. After the intense negotiations between the two Parties during the transition period of Brexit, the UK entirely forfeited from the EU making a new prospective relationship as a third country. However, it was less than perfect since only vague settlement in some parts of their future relationship was agreed. Among the agreed fields of cooperation, the security cooperation, which also covers police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, is the representing one.
This study examines the impact of Brexit on the cooperative relationship in criminal matters of the EU. Specifically, by assessing each position of the EU and the UK and analyzing different types of cooperation measures in criminal matters, this thesis aims to understand how the relationship between the EU and the UK will change and what kind of positions and approaches they will take accordingly.
-
dc.description.abstract영국은 지난 2016년 실시된 브렉시트 국민투표 결과에 따라 2020년 1월 31일 유럽연합으로부터 탈퇴하였다. 영국은 유럽연합의 출범 당시부터 유럽연합에 대해서는 비우호적인 태도를 견지하였고, 가입 후에도 유럽연합 정책에 전폭적인 지지를 보내지 않았다는 점에서 영국의 탈퇴는 어느 정도 예상되었던 사항이다. 브렉시트의 전환기간 동안 양 당사자들간의 치열한 거쳐 영국은 유럽연합으로부터 완전히 탈퇴하였고, 제3국으로서 유럽연합과 새로운 관계를 갖게 되었다. 그러나 그들의 미래 관계 중 일부에 대해서만 추상적인 합의가 이루어졌다는 점에서 완벽한 협력 관계가 형성된 것은 아니다. 합의가 이루어진 부분들 중 경찰 및 형사사법공조를 포함하는 안보 협력은 그 대표적인 예이다.
본 연구는 영국의 브렉시트가 유럽연합의 형사사법 협력관계에 미칠 영향에 대해 고찰한다. 구체적으로는 영국과 유럽연합의 각 입장 검토 및 분야별 세부 협력제도들에 대한 분석 통해 유럽연합의 형사사법공조 시스템이 추후 어떻게 변화할 것인지, 각 당사자들은 어떠한 입장 또는 전략을 취할 것인지 예측하고자 한다.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract (English)

Table of Contents

I. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1
1. Research Background .................................................................................................. 1
2. Research Question ....................................................................................................... 5
3. Literature Review ......................................................................................................... 7
4. Research Methodology ................................................................................................ 13
5. Structure of Thesis ....................................................................................................... 16

II. Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters of the EU ........................................................ 17
1. Development of Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters of the EU .............................. 17
2. Measures of Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters of the EU .................................... 21
1) Europol ....................................................................................................................... 23
2) Eurojust ...................................................................................................................... 24
3) Schengen Information System ..................................................................................... 26
4) European Arrest Warrant ............................................................................................ 27

III. Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters of the UK ....................................................... 28
1. UKs Status in the Area of Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters of the EU ................ 28
2. UKs Participation before Brexit ...................................................................................... 31
1) Europol ........................................................................................................................ 31
2) Eurojust ....................................................................................................................... 32
3) Schengen Information System ...................................................................................... 33
4) European Arrest Warrant ............................................................................................. 34
3. UKs Status during the Transition Period ........................................................................ 36

IV. The EU-UK Relationship beyond Brexit .......................................................................... 38
1. Positions on the Framework of the Future EU-UK Relationship ........................................ 38
1) European Council .......................................................................................................... 43
2) European Parliament ..................................................................................................... 44
3) European Commission ................................................................................................... 46
4) United Kingdom ............................................................................................................ 49
2. Analysis for the Potential Forms of Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters ..................... 53
1) Europol ......................................................................................................................... 54
2) Eurojust ......................................................................................................................... 55
3) Schengen Information System ........................................................................................ 56
4) European Arrest Warrant ............................................................................................... 57

V. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 59

Bibliography
Abstract (Korean)


List of Tables
Table 1. List of EUs leading measures of judicial cooperation in criminal matters .................... 22
Table 2. Numbers of Access of the UK and the Member States to SIS II .................................... 33
Table 3. Numbers of Wanted from the UK by European Arrest Warrant ................................... 35
Table 4. Numbers of Wanted by the UK by European Arrest Warrant ....................................... 35
Table 5. Chronology of the Brexit Negotiation ......................................................................... 39
-
dc.format.extentv, 71-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectBrexit-
dc.subjectEuropean Union-
dc.subjectJudicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters-
dc.subjectCriminal Cooperation-
dc.subjectEU-UK Relationship-
dc.subject브렉시트-
dc.subject유럽연합-
dc.subject형사사법공조-
dc.subject형사협력-
dc.subject유럽연합-영국 관계-
dc.subject.ddc307-
dc.titleBrexit and the Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters of the EU-
dc.title.alternative브렉시트와 유럽연합의 형사사법공조-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.typeDissertation-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorKyuhyun Cho-
dc.contributor.department국제대학원 국제학과(국제지역학전공)-
dc.description.degreeMaster-
dc.date.awarded2021-02-
dc.identifier.uciI804:11032-000000165151-
dc.identifier.holdings000000000044▲000000000050▲000000165151▲-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share