Publications

Detailed Information

A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-alpha) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLim, Soo Kun-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Bak Leong-
dc.contributor.authorVisvanathan, Ravindran-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Su Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Jin Seok-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sung Gyun-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Jae Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Chun Soo-
dc.contributor.authorMorad, Zaki-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T06:41:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-07T06:41:27Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-25-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Nephrology. 2021 Nov 25;22(1):391ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1471-2369-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/177013-
dc.description.abstractBackground
Erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) has been standard of care in treating renal anaemia for the past 20 years. Many patients have limited access to ESA in view of long-term costs leading to suboptimal ESA dosage. Biosimilar epoetin is a potential cost-effective alternative to originator for optimal renal anaemia management.

Objective
To determine efficacy and safety of PDA10 in treating renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients, in comparison to the originator epoetin-α, Eprex®.

Methods
A phase 3, multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled and parallel group study conducted over 40 weeks in Malaysia and Korea. End stage kidney disease patients undergoing regular haemodialysis who were on erythropoietin treatment were recruited. The study has 3 phases, which included a 12-week titration phase, followed by 28-week double-blind treatment phase and 24-week open-label extension phase.

Results
The PDA10 and Eprex® were shown to be therapeutically equivalent (p < 0.0001) with mean absolute change in haemoglobin from baseline of − 0.176 (± 0.91) g/dl and − 0.118 (± 1.114) g/dl, respectively. Weekly dose change was 10.01 IU/kg/week in PDA10 group and 10.30 IU/kg/week in Eprex® group, which has no significant difference. There were no significant differences in the safety profile between PDA10 and Eprex® groups.

Conclusion
This study has confirmed the therapeutic equivalence between PDA10 and Eprex® in terms of efficacy, dosage requirement and safety profile in haemodialysis patients with renal anaemia.


Trial registration
The study was registered with the National Medical Research Register (
NMRR-13-400-16313

). This study has been registered retrospectively with Clinical Research Information Service (
CRiS

), Republic of Korea on 25 March 2021.
ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant from Duopharma Biotech Bhd. (Malaysia) and Pangen Biotech Inc. (Korea).ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBMCko_KR
dc.subjectAnaemia-
dc.subjectEpoetin-α-
dc.subjectHaemodialysis-
dc.subjectPDA10-
dc.subjectherapeutic equivalence-
dc.titleA multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-alpha) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failureko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김수현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor전진석-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김성균-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장재현-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임천수-
dc.citation.journaltitleBMC Nephrologyko_KR
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.date.updated2021-11-28T04:15:16Z-
dc.citation.number1ko_KR
dc.citation.startpage391ko_KR
dc.citation.volume22ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share