Publications

Detailed Information

Knowledge Management of The Olympic Games : 올림픽대회의 지식관리: 평창 동계올림픽/장애인올림픽 위원회 사례
A Case Study of PyeongChang Organizing Committee of Olympic/Paralympic Games

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor강준호-
dc.contributor.author퍼미타-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T06:48:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-05T06:48:51Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.other000000167886-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/177866-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dcollection.snu.ac.kr/common/orgView/000000167886ko_KR
dc.description학위논문(석사) -- 서울대학교대학원 : 사범대학 체육교육과,글로벌스포츠매니지먼트전공, 2021.8. 퍼미타.-
dc.description.abstractThe Olympic Games Knowledge Management (OGKM) has been run as one of important program in the organization of the Olympic Games. The idea of running this program began in Sidney 2000 when the International Olympic Committee (IOC) aware the needs of knowledge sharing between Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games (OCOG).
Although the program has existed for almost two decades, the issue related to the organization of the OG is still existed. This also occurred in PyeongChang 2018 Winter Olympic/Paralympic Games (PC 2018) where issue related to sustainability, environment and legacy became the most discuss issue either in media or in academic research.
The purpose of this study is to examine the detail implementation of the Knowledge Management (KM) in PC 2018. The research adopted qualitative approach by conducting case study in PC 2018. Semi structured interviewed was prepared to collect the data from participants.
Participants was selected based on their involvement in as PyeongChang Organizing Committee of the Olympic/Paralympic Games (POCOG). The open ended and video conference interview was employed for data collection method. The KM activities framework and SECI model will be used to analyzed the KM process occurred in PC 2018. The KM activities framework (Parent, et al, 2014) and Nonaka (1994) SECI model will be used to analyzed the KM process occurred in PC 2018.
The findings from the interview result indicate that there are four activities of knowledge sharing conducting in PC 2018 in which IOC was mentioned as the significant source of the knowledge. Another finding indicate that socialization occurred the most in the process of knowledge creation where interpersonal communication is considered as the easiest way to gain the knowledge. In addition, individual knowledge and human resources was considered as the most significant factor in conducting effective KM.
-
dc.description.abstract올림픽대회의 지식 관리는 올림픽대회조직에서 중요한 프로그램 중 하나로 꼽힌다. 시초는 올림픽 조직위원들이 국제올림픽 위원들 간의 지식공유 필요성을 인식하면서 2000년 시드니올림픽에서 시작되었다. 본 프로그램은 생긴지 20년이 넘었지만 올림픽대회 관련해서 풀리지 않는 문제는 아직 개선되고있지 않은 상황이다. 지속 가능성, 환경, 그리고 유산 이슈는 2018 평창동계올림픽 또한 예외가 아니었으며 미디어와 학술연구에서 가장 언급이 많이 되고있다.
본 연구의 목적은 2018 평창동계올림픽의 지식관리 (KM) 시행을 세부적으로 분석하는 것이다. 2018 평창동계올림픽 사례를 통한 질적 연구는 참여자를 반구조화된 면접을 통해 실시하였다. 참여자 선정기준은 올림픽/징애인올림픽의 평창올림픽 조직위원들을 상대로 진행하였다. 한도가 없는 비디오 인터뷰를 진행하여 데이터 수집을 할 수 있었다. 지식관리 활동 체제와 SECI 모델을 이용하여 2018 평창올림픽지식관리 과정을 분석하였다.
인터뷰 결과는 4개의 지식관리 활동으로 나누어져 있었으며 올림픽 위원회가 가장 중요한 원인이라고 언급되었다. 그 외에 또 다른 유의한 결과로는 지식 개발 과정에서 사회화가 존재하였고 대인커뮤니케이션이 지식을 얻는데 가장 쉬운 방법이라는 것을 알 수 있었다. 그밖에 개인 지식과 인력이 효과적인 지식 관리를 진행하는데 있어서 가장 중요한 요인이라는 것을 확인 할 수 있었다.
-
dc.description.tableofcontentsCHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background of the study 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem 5
1.3 Significant of the Study 7
1.4 Purpose of the Study 7
1.5 Research Question 7
CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 9
2.1 Key Concept in Knowledge Management 9
2.1.1 Definition of Knowledge 9
2.1.2 Concept of Tacit and Explicit Knowledge 11
2.2 Knowledge Management Process 14
2.3 Factor Affecting Effective Knowledge Management 17
2.4 Literature on Knowledge Management in Olympic Games 20
2.4.1 Sidney 2000 20
2.4.2 Beijing 2008 22
2.4.3 London 2012 23
2.4.4 Vancouver 2010 23
CHAPTER 3. METHOD 25
3.1 Overview 25
3.2 Research Design 25
3.3 Qualitative Approach 26
3.4 Rationale of Case Study 29
3.5 Data Collection 30
3.5.1 Interview 31
3.5.2 Research Participants.32
3.5.3 Interview Question 34
3.6 Data analysis 36
3.7 Data Trustworthiness 38
CHAPTER 4 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 40
4.1 Fact Overview PyeongChang 2018 40
4.2 Thematic Analysis of the Findings 42
4.3 KM Implementation in PC 2018 51
4.3.1 KM Process in PyeongChang 2018 51
4.3.2 Knowledge Source 62
4.3.3 Knowledge Storage Media 68
4.4 Knowledge Creation in Practice 70
4.4.1 Socialization as The Frequent Implementation of Knowledge Creation 71
4.4.2 Utilizing IT Based Storage for Externalization Process 74
4.4.3 Combination Process Through Translating Document 76
4.4.4 Internalization Occurred Through Test Event 77
4.5 The Challenges of KM Implementation in POCOG 80
4.5.1 People Management 80
4.5.2 Individual Capability and Motivation Delaying the Knowledge Creation 82
4.5.3 Games Environment Interrupting the Knowledge Transfer 85
4.6 Hierarchical Structure as The Key to Overcome the Challenge 89
4.7 Factor affecting Effective KM 90
4.7.1 Knowledge Management Process 91
4.7.2 Knowledge Sharing Mechanism 94
4.7.3 Significant of Individual Knowledge 97
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 93
5.1 Limitation of The Case Study Setting 93
5.2 Implication 94
5.3 Conclusion 96
REFERENCES 100
국문초록 110
-
dc.format.extentx, 117-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisher서울대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectKnowledge-
dc.subjectKnowledge Management-
dc.subjectOlympic Games-
dc.subjectPyeongChang 2018-
dc.subject지식-
dc.subject지식 관리-
dc.subject올림픽 대회-
dc.subject2018 평창동계올림픽-
dc.subject.ddc796.069-
dc.titleKnowledge Management of The Olympic Games-
dc.title.alternative올림픽대회의 지식관리: 평창 동계올림픽/장애인올림픽 위원회 사례-
dc.typeThesis-
dc.typeDissertation-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthorPermita Adi Listiani-
dc.contributor.department사범대학 체육교육과,글로벌스포츠매니지먼트전공-
dc.description.degree석사-
dc.date.awarded2021-08-
dc.title.subtitleA Case Study of PyeongChang Organizing Committee of Olympic/Paralympic Games-
dc.identifier.uciI804:11032-000000167886-
dc.identifier.holdings000000000046▲000000000053▲000000167886▲-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share