Publications

Detailed Information

Distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia and its association with other anomalies

Cited 6 time in Web of Science Cited 7 time in Scopus
Authors

Yang, Il-Hyung; Chung, Jee Hyeok; Yim, Sunjin; Cho, Il-Sik; Lim, Seung-Weon; Kim, Kikap; Kim, Sukwha; Choi, Jin-Young; Lee, Jong-Ho; Kim, Myung-Jin; Baek, Seung-Hak

Issue Date
2020-01
Publisher
대한치과교정학회
Citation
Korean Journal of Orthodontics, Vol.50 No.1, pp.33-41
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia (HFM) and its association with other anomalies. Methods: This study included 249 Korean patients with HFM, whose charts, photographs, radiographs, and/or computed tomography scans acquired during 1998-2018 were available from Seoul National University Hospital and Dental Hospital. Prevalence according to sex, side involvement, degree of mandibular deformity, compensatory growth of the mandibular body, and Angle's classification, and its association with other anomalies were statistically analyzed. Results: Prevalence was not different between male and female patients (55.0% vs. 45.0%, p > 0.05). Unilateral HFM (UHFM) was more prevalent than bilateral HFM (BHFM) (86.3% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.001). Although distribution of the Pruzansky-Kaban types differed significantly in patients with UHFM (1, 53.0%; Ila, 18.6%; Ilb, 24.7%; III, 3.7%; p < 0.001), no difference was observed in occurrence between the right and left sides (52.6% vs. 47.4%, p > 0.05). Among patients with BHFM, prevalence of different Pruzansky-Kaban types on the right and left sides was greater than that of the same type on both sides (67.6% vs. 32.4%, p < 0.05). Despite hypoplasia of the condyle/ramus complex, compensatory growth of the mandibular body on the ipsilateral side occurred in 35 patients (14.1%). Class I and II molar relationships were more prevalent than Class III molar relationships (93.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Forty-eight patients (19.3%) had other anomalies, with 50.0% and 14.4% in the BHFM and UHFM groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with HFM require individualized diagnosis and treatment planning because of diverse phenotypes and associations with other anomalies.
ISSN
2234-7518
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/179657
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.33
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share