Publications

Detailed Information

Clinical outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after technologic advances including contact force-guided and ablation index-guided ablation

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors

Won Kyeong Jeon; So‑Ryoung Lee; Eue‑Keun Choi; Seil Oh

Issue Date
2022-05-02
Publisher
BMC
Citation
International Journal of Arrhythmia. Vol 23(1):13
Keywords
Atrial fbrillationCatheter ablationTechnological advancesContact forceAblation index
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the influence of technological advances on ablation outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (PeAF). Radiofrequency ablation for patients with AF has advanced, including contact force (CF)-sensing catheters and the ablation index (AI).
Between 2009 and 2018, we analyzed 173 patients with PeAF who underwent catheter ablation. We categorized them into three groups: AF ablation without CF and AI information (no-CF group, n = 63), with CF without AI (CF-only group, n = 49), and with optimal AI-guided ablation (AI group, n = 61). Early (within 3months, ER) and late (from 3months to 1year, LR) AF recurrence after ablation was assessed. Procedure-related complications were also evaluated.
The baseline characteristics were similar among the 3 groups, excluding the baseline antiarrhythmic drug history. Additional substrate modification after pulmonary vein isolation was significantly low in frequency in the AI group (71.4%, no-CF; 69.4%, CF-only; 41.0%, AI, p = 0.001). The AI group had a shorter mean procedure-related time than the other groups. Both ER and LR of PeAF showed a trend of reduction with technological advances. With a short experience (less than 1year), the CF-only group showed more ER and LR than that shown by the AI group. However, with a long experience (more than 1year), ER and LR occurred similarly in the two groups. Procedure-related complications improved with technological advances.
As ablation technology advanced, favorable clinical outcomes with short procedural times were observed. However, prospective, large multicenter studies are needed to verify these results.
ISSN
2466-1171
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/179852
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42444-022-00064-0
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share