Publications

Detailed Information

The effect of nafamostat mesilate infusion after ERCP for post-ERCP pancreatitis

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJoo Seong Kim-
dc.contributor.authorSang Hyub Lee-
dc.contributor.authorNamyoung Park-
dc.contributor.authorGunn Huh-
dc.contributor.authorJung Won Chun-
dc.contributor.authorJin Ho Choi-
dc.contributor.authorIn Rae Cho-
dc.contributor.authorWoo Hyun Paik-
dc.contributor.authorJi Kon Ryu-
dc.contributor.authorYong‑Tae Kim-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T05:27:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-13T05:27:20Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-31-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Gastroenterology. Vol.22(1):271ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1471-230X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/181276-
dc.description.abstractNafamostat mesilate decreases the incidence of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, no studies have administered nafamostat mesilate after ERCP. So we investigated if the infusion of nafamostat mesilate after ERCP can affect the post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk patients.
In a tertiary hospital, 350 high-risk patients of PEP were reviewed retrospectively. Among them, 201 patients received nafamostat mesilate after ERCP. Patient-related and procedure-related risk factors for PEP were collected. We performed a propensity score matching to adjust for the significant different baseline characteristics. The incidence and severity of PEP were evaluated according to the infusion of nafamostat mesilate. The risk factors of PEP were also analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.
The baseline characteristics were not different after the matching. The PEP rate (17.4% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.141) was insignificant. Among the PEP patients, mild PEP was significantly higher in the nafamostat mesilate group (85.7% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.021). Only one patient in the nafamostat mesilate group developed severe PEP. Although young age (odds ratio [OR] 3.60, 95% CI 1.09–11.85, P = 0.035) was a risk factor, nafamostat mesilate (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.09–0.98, P = 0.047) was a protective factor for moderate to severe PEP.
The administration of nafamostat mesilate after ERCP in high-risk patients was not effective in preventing PEP, but may attenuate the severity of PEP.
ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBMCko_KR
dc.subjectNafamostat-
dc.subjectEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-
dc.subjectPost-ERCP pancreatitis-
dc.titleThe effect of nafamostat mesilate infusion after ERCP for post-ERCP pancreatitisko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02345-3ko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitleBMC Gastroenterologyko_KR
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
dc.date.updated2022-06-05T03:12:17Z-
dc.citation.number1ko_KR
dc.citation.startpage271ko_KR
dc.citation.volume22ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share