Publications

Detailed Information

Single shot adductor canal block combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia can be effective as continuous adductor canal block in reducing opioid consumption and breakthrough pain after total knee arthroplasty

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sung Eun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Hyuk-Soo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Myung Chul-
dc.contributor.authorRo, Du Hyun-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T01:16:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-11T01:16:04Z-
dc.date.created2022-09-08-
dc.date.issued2022-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics, Vol.9 No.1, p. 84-
dc.identifier.issn2197-1153-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/185722-
dc.description.abstractPurpose The aim of this study was to compare the following three analgesic methods after Total knee arthroplasty (TKA): intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), continuous adductor canal block (C-ACB), and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia combined with single shot adductor canal block (PCA + sACB). Methods Records of 482 patients undergoing primary TKA from September 2019 to September 2020 were analyzed. Patients were divided into three pain control groups: IV-PCA (n = 180), C-ACB (n = 173) and PCA + sACB (n = 129). Single shot adductor canal block was performed 24 h after surgery in the PCA + sACB group. Rescue opioid consumption, breakthrough pain, pain numerical rating scale (NRS), and anti-emetics administration were measured from postoperative day (POD) 1 to POD 5. Results Rescue opioid consumption was less in C-ACB or PCA + sACB group than in the IV-PCA group at POD1 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Patients in C-ACB and PCA + sACB groups had less breakthrough pain (NRS > 5) than the IV-PCA group at POD1 (p = 0.007). On POD2, C-ACB was statistically superior to IV-PCA (p = 0.011) in terms of breakthrough pain. Postoperative pain NRS was lower in the C-ACB and PCA + sACB groups than in the IV-PCA group (p = 0.025 and p = 0.019, respectively). The total number of anti-emetics consumption was lower in C-ACB and PCA + sACB groups than in the IV-PCA group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusion PCA + sACB not only reduced patients' need for rescue opioids, but also decreased the number of breakthrough pain and anti-emetics compared to IV-PCA in early postoperative days after TKA. However, C-ACB and PCA + sACB did not differ significantly in analgesic efficacy or opioid-related side effects. PCA + sACB can be as effective as C-ACB for patients undergoing TKA.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing AG-
dc.titleSingle shot adductor canal block combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia can be effective as continuous adductor canal block in reducing opioid consumption and breakthrough pain after total knee arthroplasty-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40634-022-00523-6-
dc.citation.journaltitleJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics-
dc.identifier.wosid000843515900001-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startpage84-
dc.citation.volume9-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, Hyuk-Soo-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share