Publications

Detailed Information

Maxillary molar root and canal morphology of Neolithic and modern Chinese

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorRen, H. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorKum, K. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Y. S.-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Y. J.-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, J. S.-
dc.contributor.authorPerinpanayagam, Hiran-
dc.contributor.authorWang, X. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorLi, G. J.-
dc.contributor.authorWang, F.-
dc.contributor.authorFang, H.-
dc.contributor.authorGu, Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T00:23:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-19T00:23:01Z-
dc.date.created2021-12-06-
dc.date.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Oral Biology, Vol.131, p. 105272-
dc.identifier.issn0003-9969-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/190217-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to characterize Neolithic human maxillary molars from archeological remains at the Jiaojia site, Shandong, China, and compare their ultrastructural features with sex and age-matched modern locals. Design: Maxillary first (n = 86) and second (n = 80) molars in 5000-year-old individuals (n = 50) from the Jiaojia site were scanned by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Sex and age-matched control groups were assigned from oral surgical patients at Shandong University. Images were analyzed for crown size, root length, root morphology, canal inter-orifice distances, mesiobuccal canal morphology, and second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal prevalence and location. Neolithic and modern values were compared statistically using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney test at p < .05. Results: Crown and root size were smaller, and canal inter-orifice distances were shorter in Neolithic maxillary molars than their modern counterparts. For mesiobuccal roots, Weine's Type I single canals were the most prevalent in Neolithic and modern first and second molars. MB2 canal prevalence were not significantly different (p > .05) in Neolithic (53.3%) or modern (60.5%) first molars, and Neolithic (11.3%) or modern (21.3%) second molars. But, MB2 prevalence was significantly higher for modern than ancient male first (p = .032) and second (p = .005) molars. Additionally, MB2 were located more mesially and closer to MB1 in Neolithic than modern molars. Conclusions: Maxillary molar root and canal morphology of ancient 5000-year-old remains at the Jiaojia site resemble that of local patients. A trend towards larger tooth size, and more dispersed MB2 canals over this short evolutionary period warrants additional investigation.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisherPergamon Press Ltd.-
dc.titleMaxillary molar root and canal morphology of Neolithic and modern Chinese-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105272-
dc.citation.journaltitleArchives of Oral Biology-
dc.identifier.wosid000704457900002-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85115986331-
dc.citation.startpage105272-
dc.citation.volume131-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKum, K. Y.-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMICRO-COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONE-BEAM-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMESIOBUCCAL ROOT-
dc.subject.keywordPlus1ST MOLARS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNATURAL-SELECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDENTAL REDUCTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTOOTH SIZE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEVOLUTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONFIGURATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPOPULATION-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBiological evolution-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCone-beam computed tomography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorInter-orifice distance-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMaxillary molar root morphology-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorNeolithic-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSecond mesiobuccal canal-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share