Publications

Detailed Information

Morphological measurements of two separate mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars using micro-computed tomography

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Yeon-Jee-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong-Ki-
dc.contributor.authorPerinpanayagam, Hiran-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Soram-
dc.contributor.authorGu, Yu-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Seok-Woo-
dc.contributor.authorShon, Won-Jun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, WooCheol-
dc.contributor.authorBaek, Seung-Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKum, Kee-Yeon-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-10T07:08:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-10T07:08:46Z-
dc.date.created2021-01-28-
dc.date.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Investigations, Vol.24 No.11, pp.3863-3870-
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/195004-
dc.description.abstractObjectives To obtain radicular measurements of two separate mesiobuccal (MB) root canals in maxillary first molars using micro-computed tomography (mu CT) with customized software. Materials and methods Human maxillary first molar MB roots (N = 36) with two separate canals (MB1, MB2) and apical foramina were scanned by mu CT and analyzed with Kappa2 software to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) surface models of roots and canals. These models were sectioned at 0.1 mm intervals perpendicular to the central axis of each canal. Canal widths, 3D curvatures, and surrounding dentine thicknesses were measured concurrently on each section. Dentine thicknesses were analyzed statistically for differences between each direction and the different levels of both canals. Results Dentine walls around MB1 were thicker than MB2 (p < 0.05). Thinnest dentine was most often located at disto-inside direction in both canals. Canal widths were significantly smaller in MB2 than MB1 (p < 0.01). Apical constrictions were smaller (p < 0.05) and further (p < 0.05) from the apex in MB2 than MB1. Canal curvatures were greatest in the apical third of both canals (p < 0.001), and they were greater in MB2 than MB1 (p < 0.05). Conclusions MB2 canals had shorter lengths, smaller widths, and more severe curvatures and were surrounded by thinner dentine walls. In MB2, apical constrictions were between 1 and 2 mm from the apex, compared to about 1 mm for MB1.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag-
dc.titleMorphological measurements of two separate mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars using micro-computed tomography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-020-03252-1-
dc.citation.journaltitleClinical Oral Investigations-
dc.identifier.wosid000564394800001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85082017825-
dc.citation.endpage3870-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startpage3863-
dc.citation.volume24-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShon, Won-Jun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, WooCheol-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorBaek, Seung-Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKum, Kee-Yeon-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlus3-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusROOT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONFIGURATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCURVATURE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANATOMY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPREVALENCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlus1ST-MOLARS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSYSTEMS-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorApical constriction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCanal curvature-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCanal width-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDentine thickness-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMicro-computed tomography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSecond mesiobuccal canal-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share