Publications

Detailed Information

Defining data-driven subgroups of obsessive–compulsive disorder with different treatment responses based on resting-state functional connectivity

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKwak, Seoyeon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Minah-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Taekwan-
dc.contributor.authorKwak, Yoobin-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Sanghoon-
dc.contributor.authorLho, Silvia Kyungjin-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Sun-Young-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tae Young-
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Jun Soo-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-11T01:29:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-11T01:29:14Z-
dc.date.created2020-12-07-
dc.date.issued2020-10-26-
dc.identifier.citationTranslational Psychiatry, Vol.10 No.1, p. 359-
dc.identifier.issn2158-3188-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/195024-
dc.description.abstractCharacterization of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), like other psychiatric disorders, suffers from heterogeneities in its symptoms and therapeutic responses, and identification of more homogeneous subgroups may help to resolve the heterogeneity. We aimed to identify the OCD subgroups based on resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) and to explore their differences in treatment responses via a multivariate approach. From the resting-state functional MRI data of 107 medication-free OCD patients and 110 healthy controls (HCs), we selected rsFC features, which discriminated OCD patients from HCs via support vector machine (SVM) analyses. With the selected brain features, we subdivided OCD patients into subgroups using hierarchical clustering analyses. We identified 35 rsFC features that achieved a high sensitivity (82.74%) and specificity (76.29%) in SVM analyses. The OCD patients were subdivided into two subgroups, which did not show significant differences in their demographic and clinical backgrounds. However, one of the OCD subgroups demonstrated more impaired rsFC that was involved either within the default mode network (DMN) or between DMN brain regions and other network regions. This subgroup also showed both lower improvements in symptom severity in the 16-week follow-up visit and lower responder percentage than the other subgroup. Our results highlight that not only abnormalities within the DMN but also aberrant rsFC between the DMN and other networks may contribute to the treatment response and support the importance of these neurobiological alterations in OCD patients. We suggest that abnormalities in these connectivity may play predictive biomarkers of treatment response, and aid to build more optimal treatment strategies.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group-
dc.titleDefining data-driven subgroups of obsessive–compulsive disorder with different treatment responses based on resting-state functional connectivity-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41398-020-01045-4-
dc.citation.journaltitleTranslational Psychiatry-
dc.identifier.wosid000589694100001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85093942523-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startpage359-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKwon, Jun Soo-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNETWORK DEACTIVATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPREDICTS RESPONSE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFRONTAL-CORTEX-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBRAIN NETWORKS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHEAD MOTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSCALE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHARMACOTHERAPY-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share