Publications

Detailed Information

Prospective, multicenter validation of the deep learning-based cardiac arrest risk management system for predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest or unplanned intensive care unit transfer in patients admitted to general wards

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorCho, Kyung-Jae-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jung Soo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dong Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang‑Min-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Myung Jin-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Sung Yoon-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Young-Jae-
dc.contributor.authorJo, You Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Yunseob-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yeon Joo-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-14T06:21:13Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-14T15:21:46Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-05-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care,Vol.27(1):346ko_KR
dc.identifier.issn1364-8535-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/195559-
dc.description.abstractBackground
Retrospective studies have demonstrated that the deep learning-based cardiac arrest risk management system (DeepCARS™) is superior to the conventional methods in predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). This prospective study aimed to investigate the predictive accuracy of the DeepCARS™ for IHCA or unplanned intensive care unit transfer (UIT) among general ward patients, compared with that of conventional methods in real-world practice.

Methods
This prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted at four teaching hospitals in South Korea. All adult patients admitted to general wards during the 3-month study period were included. The primary outcome was predictive accuracy for the occurrence of IHCA or UIT within 24 h of the alarm being triggered. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values were used to compare the DeepCARS™ with the modified early warning score (MEWS), national early warning Score (NEWS), and single-parameter track-and-trigger systems.

Results
Among 55,083 patients, the incidence rates of IHCA and UIT were 0.90 and 6.44 per 1,000 admissions, respectively. In terms of the composite outcome, the AUROC for the DeepCARS™ was superior to those for the MEWS and NEWS (0.869 vs. 0.756/0.767). At the same sensitivity level of the cutoff values, the mean alarm counts per day per 1,000 beds were significantly reduced for the DeepCARS™, and the rate of appropriate alarms was higher when using the DeepCARS™ than when using conventional systems.

Conclusion
The DeepCARS™ predicts IHCA and UIT more accurately and efficiently than conventional methods. Thus, the DeepCARS™ may be an effective screening tool for detecting clinical deterioration in real-world clinical practice.

Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04951973) on June 30, 2021.
ko_KR
dc.description.sponsorshipThe corresponding author (YJL) was supported by Korea Medical Device Development Fund Grant funded by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health & Welfare, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) (Project Number: 202015X02) and SNUBH research fund (14-2017-0021)ko_KR
dc.language.isoenko_KR
dc.publisherBMCko_KR
dc.subjectCardiac arrest-
dc.subjectIntensive care unit-
dc.subjectEarly warning score-
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence-
dc.subjectDeep learning-
dc.subjectRapid response system-
dc.titleProspective, multicenter validation of the deep learning-based cardiac arrest risk management system for predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest or unplanned intensive care unit transfer in patients admitted to general wardsko_KR
dc.typeArticleko_KR
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-023-04609-0ko_KR
dc.citation.journaltitleCritical Careko_KR
dc.language.rfc3066en-
dc.rights.holderBioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature-
dc.date.updated2023-09-10T03:10:28Z-
dc.citation.volume27ko_KR
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share