Publications

Detailed Information

Comparison of 2D, 2.5D, and 3D segmentation networks for maxillary sinuses and lesions in CBCT images

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors

Yoo, Yeon-Sun; Kim, DaEl; Yang, Su; Kang, Se-Ryong; Kim, Jo-Eun; Huh, Kyung-Hoe; Lee, Sam-Sun; Heo, Min-Suk; Yi, Won-Jin

Issue Date
2023-11-15
Publisher
BMC
Citation
BMC Oral Health, Vol.23(1):866
Keywords
Deep learningCBCT imageMaxillary sinus segmentationMaxillary sinus lesion segmentation2.5D network
Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study was to compare the segmentation performances of the 2D, 2.5D, and 3D networks for maxillary sinuses (MSs) and lesions inside the maxillary sinus (MSL) with variations in sizes, shapes, and locations in cone beam CT (CBCT) images under the same constraint of memory capacity.

Methods
The 2D, 2.5D, and 3D networks were compared comprehensively for the segmentation of the MS and MSL in CBCT images under the same constraint of memory capacity. MSLs were obtained by subtracting the prediction of the air region of the maxillary sinus (MSA) from that of the MS.

Results
The 2.5D network showed the highest segmentation performances for the MS and MSA compared to the 2D and 3D networks. The performances of the Jaccard coefficient, Dice similarity coefficient, precision, and recall by the 2.5D network of U-net +  + reached 0.947, 0.973, 0.974, and 0.971 for the MS, respectively, and 0.787, 0.875, 0.897, and 0.858 for the MSL, respectively.

Conclusions
The 2.5D segmentation network demonstrated superior segmentation performance for various MSLs with an ensemble learning approach of combining the predictions from three orthogonal planes.
ISSN
1472-6831
Language
English
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/196142
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03607-6
Files in This Item:
Appears in Collections:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share