Publications

Detailed Information

Effects of Reinforcement on Ballistic Resistance of RC Targets

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor조재열-
dc.contributor.authorAHN JIN-HO-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-20T13:25:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-20T13:25:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-
dc.identifier.other000000177238-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dcollection.snu.ac.kr/common/orgView/000000177238-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/196251-
dc.description.abstractReinforced concrete (RC) is a widely used construction material, renowned for its high strength and durability. Despite this, when subjected to high-velocity impacts, such as those from ballistic projectiles or blast loading, RC structures are prone to local failure. This can significantly damage their structural integrity, potentially leading to total failure. Therefore, understanding the failure behavior of RC structures under such impact loads is of critical importance.
The rebar ratio is one of the factors that affect the erosion behavior of RC targets. The rebar ratio refers to the proportion of rebar (reinforcing steel) in the RC target relative to the concrete. A higher rebar ratio is expected to result in higher resistance to local failure, as the rebar provides additional reinforcement to the concrete. The hardness of the projectile is another factor that affects the failure behavior of RC targets. An ogive-nose steel projectile is expected to cause more profound local failure than a soft-type projectile, as a projectile is a relatively minor projectile deformation after a collision.
In this study, a series of impact tests were performed on RC targets with different rebar ratios and impact velocities using ogive-nose steel projectile. The penetration depth, scabbing& perforation limit were measured and analyzed as a function of the rebar ratio and impact velocity. The accuracy of existing empirical formulae recommended by various design standards for military and nuclear structures was verified using the results, and a modified empirical formula for predicting the penetration depth of RC targets subjected to impact loading was developed.
A total of 21 RC targets were tested in this study, with four different rebar ratios (0%, 1.6%, 2.5%, and 3.4%) and a constant target size of 600mm x 600mm x 500mm. The targets were made of normal-weight concrete with a compressive strength of 52 MPa. The rebar was made of high-strength steel with a yield strength of 470 MPa.
The impact tests were performed using a 60 mm single-stage gas gun in EPTC, in which an ogive-nose steel projectile was launched through helium gas pressure and collided with the RC target at the target speed. The impact velocity was varied from 550m/s to 850m/s in increments of 50m/s. The penetration depth, scabbing& perforation limit was measured after each impact test and recorded for analysis.
The results showed that the rebar ratio sig the local failure behavior of the RC targets. The targets with a higher rebar ratio (2.5% and 3.4%) showed less erosion than those with a lower rebar ratio (0% and 1.6%). The results also showed that the impact velocity sig the failure of the RC target, with higher impact velocities resulting in higher impact damage.
Based on the results, a modified empirical formula was suggested for predicting the impact damage of RC targets subjected to impact loading. The formula takes into account both the rebar ratio and impact velocity. Then, the validity of the proposed formula was verified by applying it to the existing experimental data of 153ea and FEA using the LS-Dyna program.
In conclusion, this study has investigated the impact response of reinforced concrete (RC) targets under various loading conditions, including different rebar ratios and striking velocities. The results have shown that the rebar ratio can significantly impact the RC target's response to impact loading. The modified empirical formula developed in this study provides a valuable tool for predicting the response of RC targets to impact loading. It can inform design and engineering decisions related to impact resistance.
Future work in this area could include further testing with a larger number of RC target specimens and developing more detailed numerical models better to understand the mechanisms of impact damage in RC targets. Additionally, it may be helpful to investigate the impact response of RC targets under more realistic loading conditions, such as those that incorporate dynamic loading and material nonlinearities.
Overall, this study has contributed to a deeper understanding of the impact response of RC targets and has provided valuable insights into the factors that can affect this response. This study's findings can inform the design and engineering of structures subjected to impact loading and ensure that these structures are adequately protected against impact damage.
-
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction 1
1.1. Research background 1
1.2. Research objectives and scope 10
1.3. Organization 12
2. Literature Review 14
2.1. Introduction 14
2.2. Design codes & guideline for local effect 15
2.2.1. Military design codes & guidelines 15
2.2.2. NPP design codes & guidelines 17
2.3. Existing empirical formulae 18
2.3.1. Modified Petry formula 21
2.3.2. Ballistic Research Laboratory (BRL) formula 22
2.3.3. Army corps of engineers (ACE) formula 22
2.3.4. Modified NDRC formula 23
2.3.5. Kar formula 25
2.3.6. CEA-EDF formula 26
2.3.7. UKAEA formula 27
2.3.8. Bechtel formula 29
2.3.9. Stone and Webster formula 29
2.3.10. Degen formula 30
2.3.11. Haldar-Hamieh formula 30
2.3.12. Adeli-Amin formula 31
2.3.13. Hughes formula 32
2.3.14. CRIEPI formula 34
2.3.15. Conwep formula 35
2.4. Existing analytical formulae 36
2.4.1. Dynamic cavity expansion theory for concrete material 36
2.4.1.1. Plastic region 38
2.4.1.2. Cracked-elastic region 41
2.4.1.3. Inverse calculation procedure 45
2.4.1.4. Results of the previous studies 46
2.5. Concluding remarks 48
3. Impact Test 49
3.1. Introduction 49
3.2. Test variables 50
3.2.1. Projectile preparation 53
3.2.2. Specimen preparation 57
3.3. Material tests 63
3.3.1. Concrete 63
3.3.2. Reinforcing steel bars 67
3.4. Test procedures 69
3.4.1. Test setup 69
3.4.2. Measurement and data acquisition 72
3.4.2.1 Impact and residual velocity 72
3.4.2.2. Failure mode and penetration depth 77
3.4.2.3. Mass of specimen 82
3.4.2.4. Mass and length of projectile 83
3.4.2.5. Strain of rebar 84
3.5. Concluding remarks 86
4. Test results and discussion 87
4.1. Introduction 87
4.2. Damage assessment 90
4.2.1. Failure mode 90
4.2.2. Mass loss of specimen 97
4.2.3. Mass and length loss of projectile 99
4.3. Assessment of penetration depth 103
4.4. Assessment of scabbing & perforation limit 108
4.5. Effect of reinforcement on impact resistance 111
4.6. Modification of empirical formula 115
4.6.1. Suggestion of modified impact formula 115
4.6.2. Verification of developed impact formula 119
4.7. Concluding remarks 124
5. Analytical Study 126
5.1. Introduction 126
5.2. Description of impact test for RC target 127
5.2.1. Modeling details 127
5.2.2. Material model for concrete 129
5.2.3. Material model for reinforcing steel 135
5.2.4. Material model for projectile 136
5.2.5. Data acquisition 137
5.3. Numerical analysis results 138
5.3.1. Overview of FEA analysis 138
5.3.2. Effect of reinforcement 143
5.4. Concluding Remarks 146
6. Conclusion 147
6.1. Summary and major findings of this study 147
6.2. Recommendations for further studies 149
Reference 151
Appendix A 159
Appendix B 163
Appendix C 170
국문초록 190
-
dc.format.extentxix, 192-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSeoul National University-
dc.subjectimpact test-
dc.subjectRC target-
dc.subjectballistic resistance-
dc.subjectrebar ratio-
dc.subjectogive-nose steel projectile-
dc.subjectmodified empirical formula-
dc.subject.ddc624-
dc.titleEffects of Reinforcement on Ballistic Resistance of RC Targets-
dc.typeDissertation-
dc.contributor.department공과대학 건설환경공학부-
dc.description.degreeDoctor-
dc.date.awarded2023-08-
dc.contributor.major구조공학-
dc.identifier.uciI804:11032-000000177238-
dc.identifier.holdings000000000050▲000000000058▲000000177238▲-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share