Publications

Detailed Information

Solo single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe substitute for conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSuh, Suk-Won-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, YoungRok-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Ho-Seong-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Yoo-Seok-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Jai Young-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Yoo-Shin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung-Eun-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Jaehong-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T05:16:14Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T05:16:14Z-
dc.date.created2020-04-06-
dc.date.created2020-04-06-
dc.date.issued2019-07-
dc.identifier.citationANZ Journal of Surgery, Vol.89 No.7-8, pp.900-904-
dc.identifier.issn1445-1433-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/198191-
dc.description.abstractBackground Despite the incremental application of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), this procedure has technical difficulties, including physical disturbance and an unstable surgical view through the small incision; therefore, we introduce the solo SILC (S-SILC) technique using a laparoscopic scope holder, as a simple, fixed and easy-to-perform procedure for an unassisted surgeon. Methods We performed a comparative analysis of S-SILC (n = 566) and conventional three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 874) performed from January 2013 to December 2016 at multiple centres. Results There was no significant difference of operative time between the two groups (P = 0.176); however, S-SILC showed a higher incidence of intraoperative gallbladder perforation, especially in the initial period (17.0% versus 2.3%, P < 0.001); and shorter post-operative hospital stay (3.3 +/- 1.7 versus 1.9 +/- 2.7 days, P < 0.001) than conventional three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were no significant differences in major post-operative complications between the two groups (P = 0.909) and operation type (P = 0.971) was not a significant risk factor for major post-operative complications in multivariate analysis. Conclusion S-SILC is a feasible and safe procedure; however, careful selection of surgical candidates is necessary in the early period of the experience with this method.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Inc.-
dc.titleSolo single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe substitute for conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.15347-
dc.citation.journaltitleANZ Journal of Surgery-
dc.identifier.wosid000477257800001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85068791738-
dc.citation.endpage904-
dc.citation.number7-8-
dc.citation.startpage900-
dc.citation.volume89-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, YoungRok-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHan, Ho-Seong-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMETAANALYSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSURGERY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCAMERA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPORT-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorlaparoscopic scope holder-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsingle-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsolo surgery-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share