Publications
Detailed Information
Solo single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe substitute for conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Suh, Suk-Won | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, YoungRok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Han, Ho-Seong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, Yoo-Seok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Jai Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Yoo-Shin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Seung-Eun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jeong, Jaehong | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-11T05:16:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-11T05:16:14Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-04-06 | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-04-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | ANZ Journal of Surgery, Vol.89 No.7-8, pp.900-904 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1445-1433 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/198191 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Despite the incremental application of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC), this procedure has technical difficulties, including physical disturbance and an unstable surgical view through the small incision; therefore, we introduce the solo SILC (S-SILC) technique using a laparoscopic scope holder, as a simple, fixed and easy-to-perform procedure for an unassisted surgeon. Methods We performed a comparative analysis of S-SILC (n = 566) and conventional three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 874) performed from January 2013 to December 2016 at multiple centres. Results There was no significant difference of operative time between the two groups (P = 0.176); however, S-SILC showed a higher incidence of intraoperative gallbladder perforation, especially in the initial period (17.0% versus 2.3%, P < 0.001); and shorter post-operative hospital stay (3.3 +/- 1.7 versus 1.9 +/- 2.7 days, P < 0.001) than conventional three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were no significant differences in major post-operative complications between the two groups (P = 0.909) and operation type (P = 0.971) was not a significant risk factor for major post-operative complications in multivariate analysis. Conclusion S-SILC is a feasible and safe procedure; however, careful selection of surgical candidates is necessary in the early period of the experience with this method. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc. | - |
dc.title | Solo single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe substitute for conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ans.15347 | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | ANZ Journal of Surgery | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000477257800001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85068791738 | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 904 | - |
dc.citation.number | 7-8 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 900 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 89 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Choi, YoungRok | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Han, Ho-Seong | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | METAANALYSIS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SURGERY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CAMERA | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PORT | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | laparoscopic scope holder | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | solo surgery | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.