Publications

Detailed Information

Duty, Virtue, and Filial Love

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorUm, Sungwoo-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T01:08:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-15T01:08:22Z-
dc.date.created2024-01-05-
dc.date.created2024-01-05-
dc.date.created2024-01-05-
dc.date.created2024-01-05-
dc.date.issued2024-01-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophy, Vol.99 No.1, pp.53-71-
dc.identifier.issn0031-8191-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/198875-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is to argue that the normative significance of the inner aspects of filial piety - in particular, filial love - is better captured when we understand filial love as part of the virtue of filial piety rather than as an object of duty. After briefly introducing the value of filial love, I argue that the idea of a duty to love one's loving parents faces serious difficulties in making sense of the normative significance of filial love. Then I show why the virtue-ethical approach to filial love, which views filial love as a constitutive part of the virtue of filial piety, can do justice to its normative significance while avoiding the difficulties.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.titleDuty, Virtue, and Filial Love-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S003181912300030X-
dc.citation.journaltitlePhilosophy-
dc.identifier.wosid001091355700001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85175956482-
dc.citation.endpage71-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startpage53-
dc.citation.volume99-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorUm, Sungwoo-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share