Comparative ignorance hypothesis and business training

Shapiro, Dmitry A.

doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109640

서울대학교 중앙도서관

S-Space 소개

My S-Space

로그인이 필요합니다.

S-Space

Publications

Detailed Information

Comparative ignorance hypothesis and business training

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Shapiro, Dmitry A.	-
dc.date.accessioned	2024-05-14T07:25:49Z	-
dc.date.available	2024-05-14T07:25:49Z	-
dc.date.created	2021-02-10	-
dc.date.created	2021-02-10	-
dc.date.created	2021-02-10	-
dc.date.created	2021-02-10	-
dc.date.created	2021-02-10	-
dc.date.issued	2020-12	-
dc.identifier.citation	Economics Letters, Vol.197, p. 109640	-
dc.identifier.issn	0165-1765	-
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10371/202042	-
dc.description.abstract	The comparative ignorance hypothesis, first demonstrated in Heath and Tversky (1991), is that ambiguity aversion is driven by the comparison with more familiar events or more knowledgeable individuals. For example, when own ignorance is perceived to be higher, individuals tend to exhibit stronger ambiguity aversion. We use this insight to provide a theoretical explanation to a welldocumented phenomenon of business training having limited, or even negative, effect on post-training profits of program participants. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.	-
dc.language	영어	-
dc.publisher	Elsevier BV	-
dc.title	Comparative ignorance hypothesis and business training	-
dc.type	Article	-
dc.identifier.doi	10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109640	-
dc.citation.journaltitle	Economics Letters	-
dc.identifier.wosid	000600839700033	-
dc.identifier.scopusid	2-s2.0-85096495001	-
dc.citation.startpage	109640	-
dc.citation.volume	197	-
dc.description.isOpenAccess	Y	-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor	Shapiro, Dmitry A.	-
dc.type.docType	Article	-
dc.description.journalClass	1	-
dc.subject.keywordPlus	AMBIGUITY	-
dc.subject.keywordPlus	CHOICE	-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor	Comparative ignorance hypothesis	-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor	Business training	-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor	Ambiguity aversion	-