Publications
Detailed Information
Credibility, preferences, and bilateral investment treaties
Cited 3 time in
Web of Science
Cited 3 time in Scopus
- Authors
- Issue Date
- 2016-03
- Publisher
- SPRINGER
- Citation
- REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, Vol.11 No.1, pp.25-58
- Abstract
- When is a commitment mechanism employed as a solution to a time-inconsistency problem? This article provides a nuanced answer to this question by studying bilateral investment treaties (BITs). We develop a game theoretic model of BIT signing in which the government of a capital-importing country and an investor from a capital-exporting country strategically interact. The model predicts that, on the one hand, when host states highly value foreign direct investment (FDI), the likelihood of BITs increases as their judicial institutions lack credibility. On the other hand, when their preferences for FDI are only modest, the likelihood of BITs increases as their judicial institutions become more credible. We employ Cox proportional hazard models to test our hypotheses, and the results largely support our theory. Our findings have broad implications for the large literature on credible commitment, which has paid insufficient attention to the interplay between preferences and credibility.
- ISSN
- 1559-7431
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
Related Researcher
- College of Social Sciences
- Department of Political Science and International Relations
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.