Publications

Detailed Information

Nodule classification on low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose enhanced CT: Inter-protocol agreement and analysis of interchangeability

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kyung Hee-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kyung Won-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ji Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Kyunghwa-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jihang-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang Min-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chang Min-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-08T01:31:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-08T01:31:45Z-
dc.date.created2019-06-13-
dc.date.created2019-06-13-
dc.date.issued2018-05-
dc.identifier.citationKorean Journal of Radiology, Vol.19 No.3, pp.516-525-
dc.identifier.issn1229-6929-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/206496-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To measure inter-protocol agreement and analyze interchangeability on nodule classification between low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose enhanced CT. Materials and Methods: From nodule libraries containing both low-dose unenhanced and standard-dose enhanced CT, 80 solid and 80 subsolid (40 part-solid, 40 non-solid) nodules of 135 patients were selected. Five thoracic radiologists categorized each nodule into solid, part-solid or non-solid. Inter-protocol agreement between low-dose unenhanced and standard-dose enhanced images was measured by pooling kappa values for classification into two (solid, subsolid) and three (solid, part-solid, non-solid) categories. Interchangeability between low-dose unenhanced and standard-dose enhanced CT for the classification into two categories was assessed using a pre-defined equivalence limit of 8 percent. Results: Inter-protocol agreement for the classification into two categories {kappa, 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.98)} and that into three categories (kappa, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.92]) was considerably high. The probability of agreement between readers with standard-dose enhanced CT was 95.6% (95% CI, 94.5-96.6%), and that between low-dose unenhanced and standard-dose enhanced CT was 95.4% (95% CI, 94.7-96.0%). The difference between the two proportions was 0.25% (95% CI, -0.85-1.5%), wherein the upper bound CI was markedly below 8 percent. Conclusion: Inter-protocol agreement for nodule classification was considerably high. Low-dose unenhanced CT can be used interchangeably with standard-dose enhanced CT for nodule classification.-
dc.language영어-
dc.publisher대한영상의학회-
dc.titleNodule classification on low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose enhanced CT: Inter-protocol agreement and analysis of interchangeability-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3348/kjr.2018.19.3.516-
dc.citation.journaltitleKorean Journal of Radiology-
dc.identifier.wosid000430314100017-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85045547826-
dc.citation.endpage525-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startpage516-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.identifier.kciidART002352819-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Kyung Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Chang Min-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSOLID PULMONARY NODULES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCHEST CT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLUNG-CANCER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTATEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPulmonary nodules-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorClassification-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSubsolid nodule-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGround-glass nodule-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorComputed tomography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorLow-dose CT-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area Radiology

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share