Publications
Detailed Information
Biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast media
Cited 19 time in
Web of Science
Cited 21 time in Scopus
- Authors
- Issue Date
- 2018-03
- Publisher
- Springer Verlag
- Citation
- European Radiology, Vol.28 No.3, pp.1242-1252
- Abstract
- To investigate the prevalence of biphasic and protracted anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast media (ICM), their risk factors and practical observation duration for detecting biphasic reaction. 145 patients with ICM anaphylaxis from January 2005-February 2016 were retrospectively categorised into uniphasic, biphasic (anaphylaxis recurrence within 72 h after resolution of initial anaphylaxis) and protracted (anaphylaxis > 5 h) reaction groups. Multivariate regression analyses of potential risk factors were performed. We calculated negative predictive value (NPV) for biphasic reactions and additional person-hours required to detect one case during post-anaphylaxis observation. Fifteen patients had biphasic reactions with secondary reactions with similar or milder severity and six had protracted reactions. Most significant risk factors were anaphylaxis duration > 40 min for biphasic reactions (odds ratio (OR), 8.65 [95 % CI, 1.05-70.71]; P=0.044), and additional epinephrine administration within 1 h of initial dosing for protracted reactions (OR, 102.0 [95 % CI, 3.40-3057.25]; P=0.008). A 6-h post-anaphylaxis observation produced NPV of 96.4 %, while requiring a minimum of 65.5 additional person-hours to detect one additional case. Biphasic and protracted ICM anaphylaxis developed in 10.3 % and 4.1 %, respectively, with revealing risk factors. Six hours could be practical for post-anaphylaxis observation to detect biphasic reaction.
- ISSN
- 0938-7994
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in Collections:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.