Publications

Detailed Information

Evaluation of Minimal Important Difference and Responder Definition in the EORTC QLQ-PAN26 Module for Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Surgically Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Cited 5 time in Web of Science Cited 5 time in Scopus
Authors

Reni, Michele; Braverman, Julia; Hendifar, Andrew; Li, Chung-Pin; Macarulla, Teresa; Oh, Do-Youn; Riess, Hanno; Tempero, Margaret; Lu, Brian; Marcus, James; Joshi, Namita; Botteman, Marc; Dueck, Amylou C.

Issue Date
2021-11
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd.
Citation
Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol.28 No.12, pp.7545-7554
Abstract
Background Although the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-PAN26 is widely used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), its group-level minimal important difference (MID) and individual-level responder definition (RD) are not established; we calculated MID and RD using HRQoL data from the APACT trial in patients with surgically resected pancreatic cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods HRQoL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 at baseline, during treatment, at end of treatment, and during follow-up. Distribution-based MIDs were estimated using 0.5 x baseline standard deviation (SD) and reliability-based (intraclass correlation) standard error of measurement (SEM). Anchor-based MIDs and RDs (anchor, QLQ-C30 overall health) were estimated using a linear mixed model. Results Overall, 772 patients completed the baseline assessment. Distribution-based MIDs (0.5 x SD) for QLQ-PAN26 scales ranged from 12 to 13, except hepatic symptoms (approximate to 8), pancreatic pain (approximate to 10), and sexual dysfunction (approximate to 17); those for stand-alone items ranged from 12 to 16. The SEM values were similar. Among scales/items sufficiently correlated (r > 0.30) with the anchor, MIDs ranged from 5 to 9. Within-patient QLQ-PAN26 RD estimates varied by direction (deterioration vs. improvement) and scale/item, but all values were lower than the true possible within-patient change (e.g. 16.7 points for a two-item scale) given a one-category change on the raw scale. Conclusions Compared with distribution-based MIDs, anchor-based MIDs were twice as sensitive in detecting group-level changes in QLQ-PAN26 scales/items. For interpreting clinically meaningful change, RDs cannot be less than the true minimum of the scale. The group-level MID may help clinicians/researchers interpret HRQoL changes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01964430; Eudra CT 2013-003398-91.
ISSN
1068-9265
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/212753
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09816-z
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area DNA 손상 반응 타겟 물질의 면역조절 효과, Effect of DNA damage response target substances on immunomodulatory action, Efficacy and biomarker validation studies of targeted therapeutics, Resistance mechanisms according to targeted therapeutics, 표적 항암제 내성 기전 연구, 표적 항암제의 효과 검증 및 바이오마커 규명

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share