Publications

Detailed Information

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of liver metastases from extrahepatic primary cancers 2021

Cited 35 time in Web of Science Cited 38 time in Scopus
Authors

Yamamoto, Masakazu; Yoshida, Masahiro; Furuse, Junji; Sano, Keiji; Ohtsuka, Masayuki; Yamashita, Shingo; Beppu, Toru; Iwashita, Yukio; Wada, Keita; Nakajima, Takako Eguchi; Sakamoto, Katsunori; Hayano, Koichi; Mori, Yasuhisa; Asai, Koji; Matsuyama, Ryusei; Hirashita, Teijiro; Hibi, Taizo; Sakai, Nozomu; Tabata, Tsutomu; Kawakami, Hisato; Takeda, Hiroyuki; Mizukami, Takuro; Ozaka, Masato; Ueno, Makoto; Naito, Yoichi; Okano, Naohiro; Ueno, Takayuki; Hijioka, Susumu; Shikata, Satoru; Ukai, Tomohiko; Strasberg, Steven; Sarr, Michael G.; Jagannath, Palepu; Hwang, Tsann-Long; Han, Ho-Seong; Yoon, Yoo-Seok; Wang, Hee Jung; Luo, Shao-Ciao; Adam, Rene; Gimenez, Mariano; Scatton, Olivier; Oh, Do-Youn; Takada, Tadahiro

Issue Date
2021-01
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Citation
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, Vol.28 No.1, pp.1-25
Abstract
Background Hepatectomy is standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases; however, it is unclear whether liver metastases from other primary cancers should be resected or not. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery therefore created clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic liver tumors. Methods Eight primary diseases were selected based on the number of hepatectomies performed for each malignancy per year. Clinical questions were structured in the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Systematic reviews were performed, and the strength of recommendations and the level of quality of evidence for each clinical question were discussed and determined. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. Results The eight primary sites were grouped into five categories based on suggested indications for hepatectomy and consensus of the guidelines committee. Fourteen clinical questions were devised, covering five topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) operative treatment, (3) ablation therapy, (4) the eight primary diseases, and (5) systemic therapies. The grade of recommendation was strong for one clinical question and weak for the other 13 clinical questions. The quality of the evidence was moderate for two questions, low for 10, and very low for two. A flowchart was made to summarize the outcomes of the guidelines for the indications of hepatectomy and systemic therapy. Conclusions These guidelines were developed to provide useful information based on evidence in the published literature for the clinical management of liver metastases, and they could be helpful for conducting future clinical trials to provide higher-quality evidence.
ISSN
1868-6974
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/212770
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.868
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area DNA 손상 반응 타겟 물질의 면역조절 효과, Effect of DNA damage response target substances on immunomodulatory action, Efficacy and biomarker validation studies of targeted therapeutics, Resistance mechanisms according to targeted therapeutics, 표적 항암제 내성 기전 연구, 표적 항암제의 효과 검증 및 바이오마커 규명

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share