Publications

Detailed Information

Randomized Phase III Trial of Pegvorhyaluronidase Alfa With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for Patients With Hyaluronan-High Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Cited 281 time in Web of Science Cited 304 time in Scopus
Authors

Van Cutsem, Eric; Tempero, Margaret A.; Sigal, Darren; Oh, Do-Youn; Fazio, Nicola; Macarulla, Teresa; Hitre, Erika; Hammel, Pascal; Hendifar, Andrew E.; Bates, Susan E.; Li, Chung-Pin; Hingorani, Sunil R.; de la Fouchardiere, Christelle; Kasi, Anup; Heinemann, Volker; Maraveyas, Anthony; Bahary, Nathan; Layos, Laura; Sahai, Vaibhav; Zheng, Lei; Lacy, Jill; Park, Joon Oh; Portales, Fabienne; Oberstein, Paul; Wu, Wilson; Chondros, Dimitrios; Bullock, Andrea J.

Issue Date
2020-09
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Citation
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol.38 No.27, pp.3185-3194
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegvorhyaluronidase alfa (PEGPH20) plus nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (AG) in patients with hyaluronan-high metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). PATIENTS AND METHODS HALO 109-301 was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients >= 18 years of age with untreated, metastatic, hyaluronan-high PDA were randomly assigned 2:1 to PEGPH20 plus AG or placebo plus AG. Treatment was administered intravenously in 4-week cycles (3 weeks on, 1 week off) until progression or intolerable adverse events: PEGPH20 3.0 mu g/kg twice per week for cycle 1 and once per week thereafter; nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) once per week; and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) once per week. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Response was independently assessed per RECIST v1.1. RESULTS At data cutoff, 494 patients were randomly assigned, with 492 (327 for PEGPH20 and 165 for placebo) included in intention-to-treat analyses. Baseline characteristics were balanced for PEGPH20 plus AG versus placebo plus AG. There were 330 deaths, with a median OS of 11.2 months for PEGPH20 plus AG versus 11.5 months for placebo plus AG (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.27; P = .97); median PFS was 7.1 months versus 7.1 months (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.26]); ORR was 47% versus 36% (ORR ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.03 to 1.63]). Grade >= 3 adverse events with a >= 2% higher rate with PEGPH20 plus AG than with placebo plus AG included fatigue (16.0% v 9.6%), muscle spasms (6.5% v 0.6%), and hyponatremia (8.0% v 3.8%). CONCLUSION The addition of PEGPH20 to AG increased the ORR but did not improve OS or PFS. The safety profile of PEGPH20 plus AG was consistent with that found in previous studies. These results do not support additional development of PEGPH20 in metastatic PDA. (C) 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN
0732-183X
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/212774
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00590
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area DNA 손상 반응 타겟 물질의 면역조절 효과, Effect of DNA damage response target substances on immunomodulatory action, Efficacy and biomarker validation studies of targeted therapeutics, Resistance mechanisms according to targeted therapeutics, 표적 항암제 내성 기전 연구, 표적 항암제의 효과 검증 및 바이오마커 규명

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share