Publications

Detailed Information

Exploratory subgroup analysis of patients with prior trastuzumab use in the ATTRACTION-2 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer

Cited 49 time in Web of Science Cited 52 time in Scopus
Authors

Satoh, Taroh; Kang, Yoon-Koo; Chao, Yee; Ryu, Min-Hee; Kato, Ken; Cheol Chung, Hyun; Chen, Jen-Shi; Muro, Kei; Ki Kang, Won; Yeh, Kun-Huei; Yoshikawa, Takaki; Oh, Sang Cheul; Bai, Li-Yuan; Tamura, Takao; Lee, Keun-Wook; Hamamoto, Yasuo; Kim, Jong Gwang; Chin, Keisho; Oh, Do-Youn; Minashi, Keiko; Cho, Jae Yong; Tsuda, Masahiro; Tanimoto, Mitsunobu; Chen, Li-Tzong; Boku, Narikazu

Issue Date
2020-01
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Citation
Gastric Cancer, Vol.23 No.1, pp.143-153
Abstract
Background Data on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer are lacking. Because HER2 status was not captured in the ATTRACTION-2 trial, we used patients with prior trastuzumab use (Tmab+) as surrogate for HER2 expression status to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab as third- or later-line therapy in these patients. Methods In ATTRACTION-2, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 multicenter trial, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks until disease progression or toxicity requiring study discontinuation. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were assessed. Results Of 493 enrolled patients, 81 (nivolumab, n = 59; placebo, n = 22) were Tmab+ and 412 (nivolumab, n = 271; placebo, n = 141) were Tmab-. In both groups, patients receiving nivolumab showed a longer median OS vs placebo (Tmab+, 8.3 [95% confidence interval, 5.3-12.9] vs 3.1 [1.9-5.3] months, hazard ratio, 0.38 [0.22-0.66]; P = 0.0006; Tmab-, 4.8 [4.1-6.0] vs 4.2 [3.6-4.9] months, 0.71 [0.57-0.88]; P = 0.0022). PFS was longer in both groups receiving nivolumab vs placebo (Tmab+, 1.6 [1.5-4.0] vs 1.5 [1.3-2.9] months, 0.49 [0.29-0.85]; P = 0.0111; Tmab-, 1.6 [1.5-2.4] vs 1.5 [1.5-1.5] months, 0.64 [0.51-0.80]; P = 0.0001). Conclusions Nivolumab was efficacious and safe as third- or later-line therapy regardless of prior trastuzumab use in patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer.
ISSN
1436-3291
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/212782
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00970-8
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area DNA 손상 반응 타겟 물질의 면역조절 효과, Effect of DNA damage response target substances on immunomodulatory action, Efficacy and biomarker validation studies of targeted therapeutics, Resistance mechanisms according to targeted therapeutics, 표적 항암제 내성 기전 연구, 표적 항암제의 효과 검증 및 바이오마커 규명

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share