Publications

Detailed Information

Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Kyo Hoon-
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-17T08:50:22Z-
dc.date.available2009-12-17T08:50:22Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationJ Korean Med Sci 2007; 22: 722-7en
dc.identifier.issn1011-8934 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17728517-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/21295-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the value of transvaginal sonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women. One hundred and sixty-one women scheduled for labor induction underwent transvaginal ultrasonography and digital cervical examinations. Logistic regression demonstrated that cervical length and gestational age at induction, but not the Bishop score, significantly and independently predicted failed labor induction. According to the receiver operating characteristic curves analysis, the best cut-off value of cervical length for predicting failed labor induction was 28 mm, with a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 60%. In terms of the likelihood of a cesarean delivery for failure to progress as the outcome variable, logistic regression indicated that maternal height and birth weight, but not cervical length or Bishop score, were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery for failure to progress. Transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length thus independently predicted failed labor induction in nulliparous women. However, the relatively poor predictive performance of this test undermines its clinical usefulness as a predictor of failed labor induction. Moreover, cervical length appears to have a poor predictive value for the likelihood of a cesarean delivery for failure to progress.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the Seoul National
University Bundang Hospital Research Fund (grant
no. 02-05-009).
en
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherKorean Academy of Medical Scienceen
dc.subjectCervical Lengthen
dc.subjectBishop Scoreen
dc.subjectLabor Inductionen
dc.subjectCesarean Delivery for Failure to Progressen
dc.subjectLabor, Obstetricen
dc.subjectPregnancyen
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.subjectROC Curveen
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen
dc.subjectTreatment Failureen
dc.subjectUltrasonography/*methodsen
dc.subjectVagina/ultrasonographyen
dc.titleTransvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous womenen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박교훈-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share