Publications
Detailed Information
Factivity and the Theory of Barriers
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chung, DaeHo | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-03-30T04:44:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-03-30T04:44:32Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1988 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 영학논집, Vol.12, pp. 188-198 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/2136 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The clausal complements of factive predicates are known to behave differently from those of non-factive predicates with respect to some linguistic phenomena. First, extraction out of non-factive complements is freer than that out of factive complements, as the following English and French sentences from Adams(l985) show: (1) a. whoi do you believe 〔ti loves Mary〕 b. whoi do you regret 〔ti loves Mary〕 (2) a. quii crois-tu 〔qui 〔ti a fait ce bruit〕〕 who do-you-believe that made that noise b. quii regrettes-tu 〔qui 〔ti chatie les enfants〕〕 who do-you-regret that punished the children. It is possible to extract the subject out of non-factive complements, whereas it is impossible out of factive complements. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | 서울대학교 인문대학 영어영문학과 | - |
| dc.subject | factive phenomena | - |
| dc.title | Factivity and the Theory of Barriers | - |
| dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
| dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | 정대호 | - |
| dc.citation.journaltitle | 영학논집(English Studies) | - |
| dc.citation.endpage | 198 | - |
| dc.citation.pages | 188-198 | - |
| dc.citation.startpage | 188 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 12 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.