Publications

Detailed Information

Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Inoperable/Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: Primary Results From TROPION-Breast01

Cited 24 time in Web of Science Cited 29 time in Scopus
Authors

Bardia, Aditya; Jhaveri, Komal; Im, Seock-Ah; Pernas, Sonia; De Laurentiis, Michelino; Wang, Shusen; Martinez Janez, Noelia; Borges, Giuliano; Cescon, David W.; Hattori, Masaya; Lu, Yen-Shen; Hamilton, Erika; Zhang, Qingyuan; Tsurutani, Junji; Kalinsky, Kevin; Rubini Liedke, Pedro Emanuel; Xu, Lu; Fairhurst, Rick M.; Khan, Sabrina; Denduluri, Neelima; Rugo, Hope S.; Xu, Binghe; Pistilli, Barbara

Issue Date
2025-01
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology
Citation
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol.43 No.3, pp.285-296
Abstract
PURPOSE The global, phase 3, open-label, randomized TROPION-Breast01 study assessed the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2-directed antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. METHODS Adult patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer, who had disease progression on endocrine therapy, for whom endocrine therapy was unsuitable, and had received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in the inoperable/metastatic setting, were randomly assigned 1:1 to Dato-DXd (6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or ICC (eribulin/vinorelbine/capecitabine/gemcitabine). Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Patients were randomly assigned to Dato-DXd (n = 365) or ICC (n = 367). Dato-DXd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death versus ICC (PFS by BICR hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76]; P < .0001). Consistent PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. Although OS data were not mature, a trend favoring Dato-DXd was observed (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.14]). The rate of grade >= 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with Dato-DXd was lower than ICC (20.8% v 44.7%). The most common TRAEs (any grade; grade >= 3) were nausea (51.1%; 1.4%) and stomatitis (50%; 6.4%) with Dato-DXd and neutropenia (grouped term, 42.5%; 30.8%) with ICC. CONCLUSION Patients receiving Dato-DXd had statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and a favorable and manageable safety profile, compared with ICC. Results support Dato-DXd as a novel treatment option for patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer who have received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in this setting.
ISSN
0732-183X
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/216930
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00920
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area Clinical Medicine

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share