Publications

Detailed Information

First-Line Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer with Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥ 1%: A Retrospective Analysis of RATIONALE-305

Cited 0 time in Web of Science Cited 0 time in Scopus
Authors

Moehler, Markus; Oh, Do-Youn; Kato, Ken; Arkenau, Tobias; Tabernero, Josep; Lee, Keun-Wook; Rha, Sun Young; Hirano, Hidekazu; Spigel, David; Yamaguchi, Kensei; Wyrwicz, Lucjan; Disel, Umut; Pazo-Cid, Roberto A.; Fornaro, Lorenzo; Xu, Yaling; Sheng, Tao; Yang, Silu; Kadva, Alysha; Cruz-Correa, Marcia; Xu, Rui-Hua

Issue Date
2025-05
Publisher
Health Communications, Inc.
Citation
Advances in Therapy, Vol.42 No.5, pp.2248-2268
Abstract
Introduction Tislelizumab plus investigator-chosen chemotherapy (ICC) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) versus placebo plus ICC in RATIONALE-305 in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) in the intent-to-treat population and in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score >= 5%. The United States Food and Drug Administration Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted (September 2024) against first-line treatment with programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors in this setting in patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score < 1 or TAP score < 1%, due to an unfavorable benefit-risk profile. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed data from RATIONALE-305 in patients with a PD-L1 TAP score >= 1%. Methods Adult patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative GC/GEJC were randomized to tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo with ICC every 3 weeks. Efficacy and safety outcomes of tislelizumab plus ICC versus placebo plus ICC were retrospectively assessed in those with a PD-L1 TAP score >= 1%. Results At the final analysis cutoff (February 28, 2023), 432 patients received tislelizumab plus ICC and 453 received placebo plus ICC, and had a PD-L1 TAP score >= 1%. Clinically meaningful improvements to OS were observed with tislelizumab plus ICC compared with placebo plus ICC [15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.3-16.7) vs. 12.8 months (95% CI 12.1-14.1), respectively; stratified hazard ratio 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.90)]. Progression-free survival, overall response rate, duration of response, and disease control rate, were also improved. OS improvements were maintained at a 3-year data cutoff (February 28, 2024). Tislelizumab plus ICC had an acceptable safety profile with no new safety signals. Conclusions Tislelizumab plus ICC is an effective and tolerable first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic HER2-negative GC/GEJC with a PD-L1 TAP score >= 1%. Trial registration numberNCT03777657.
ISSN
0741-238X
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10371/219285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03133-7
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Related Researcher

  • College of Medicine
  • Department of Medicine
Research Area DNA 손상 반응 타겟 물질의 면역조절 효과, Effect of DNA damage response target substances on immunomodulatory action, Efficacy and biomarker validation studies of targeted therapeutics, Resistance mechanisms according to targeted therapeutics, 표적 항암제 내성 기전 연구, 표적 항암제의 효과 검증 및 바이오마커 규명

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share