Publications

Detailed Information

Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, J. H.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, J. T.-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, S. Z.-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Y. J.-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorBahk, J. H.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, C. S.-
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-30T02:28:25Z-
dc.date.available2009-12-30T02:28:25Z-
dc.date.issued2007-07-11-
dc.identifier.citationBr J Anaesth. 2007 Sep;99(3):343-8. Epub 2007 Jul 9.en
dc.identifier.issn0007-0912 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17621598-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/23438-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Corrected flow time (FTc) by oesophageal Doppler is considered to be a 'static' preload index. We evaluated the ability of FTc to predict fluid responsiveness and compared this with the abilities of other preload indices, such as pulse pressure variation (PPV), central venous pressure (CVP), and left ventricular end-diastolic area index (LVEDAI). METHODS: Twenty neurosurgical patients were studied. After induction of anaesthesia, FTc, PPV, LVEDAI, CVP, and stroke volume index (SVI) were measured before and 12 min after fluid loading with 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution (7 ml kg(-1)). Responders and non-responders were defined as those patients with an SVI increase >or= 10% or < 10% after fluid loading, respectively. Pearson's correlation was used to assess correlations between changes in SVI and initial haemodynamic variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared to evaluate the overall performance of preload indices (FTc, PPV, LVEDAI, and CVP) in terms of predicting fluid responsiveness. RESULTS: FTc and PPV before fluid loading differed between responders (n = 11) and non-responders (n = 9), and correlated with changes in SVI (r = -0.515 and r = 0.696, respectively), which was opposite to that observed for CVP or LVEDAI. Areas under ROC curves for FTc [0.944 (SD 0.058)] and PPV [0.909 (0.069)] were significantly greater than those for CVP [0.540 (0.133), P < 0.001] and LVEDAI [0.495 (0.133), P < 0.001]. The optimal threshold value given by ROC analysis was 357 ms for FTc. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FTc predicted fluid responsiveness. However, FTc should be used in conjunction with other clinical information.en
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectBlood Pressureen
dc.subjectCentral Venous Pressureen
dc.subjectEchocardiography, Transesophageal/*methodsen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectFluid Therapy/*methodsen
dc.subjectHeart Rateen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectMonitoring, Intraoperative/*methodsen
dc.subjectPrognosisen
dc.subjectROC Curveen
dc.subjectStroke Volumeen
dc.titleEvaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsivenessen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bja/aem179-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share