Publications
Detailed Information
토대론적 해석이론 : 의도주의와 형식주의 : Foundationalist Theories of Interpretation: Intentionalism and Formalism
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김진엽 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-01-11T01:37:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-01-11T01:37:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 인문논총, Vol.37, pp. 81-97 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-3021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10371/29266 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Foundationalism is an idea found not only in metaphysics and epistemology but also in diverse areas such as ethics, social science, natural science, culture, and so on. I define foundationalism as the idea that there is some foundation which is the ultimate source of justification for our world, knowledge, rationality, culture, goodness and so on. In the theory of interpretation as well, to search for such a foundation of the meaning of a text is the main tradition. We have seen the modem root of foundationalism of interpretation in Schleiermacher. Before him, however, the philological and biblical hermeneutics tried to find the foundation which determined the meaning of a text. The foundationalism of interpretation is currently developed in two directions. One is Intentionalism, the other is Formalism. | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 서울대학교 인문대학 인문학연구소 | - |
dc.title | 토대론적 해석이론 : 의도주의와 형식주의 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Foundationalist Theories of Interpretation: Intentionalism and Formalism | - |
dc.type | SNU Journal | - |
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor | Kim, Jinyup | - |
dc.citation.journaltitle | 인문논총(Journal of humanities) | - |
dc.citation.endpage | 97 | - |
dc.citation.pages | 81-97 | - |
dc.citation.startpage | 81 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 37 | - |
- Appears in Collections:
- Files in This Item:
Item View & Download Count
Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.