Browse

A Multiinstitutional Consensus Study on the Pathologic Diagnosis of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Carcinoma

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSuh, Kwang Sun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Insun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Moon Hyang-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Geung Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorSohn, Jin Hee-
dc.contributor.authorPark, In Ae-
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Hye Kyoung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyu Rae-
dc.contributor.authorAn, Hee Jung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Dong Won-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Mi Jin-
dc.contributor.authorJoo, Hee Jae-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Eun Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Young Hee-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Chong Woo-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Kyung Un-
dc.contributor.authorYi, Sang Yeop-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hye Sun-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Sung Ran-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hee Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sun-
dc.date.accessioned2009-06-12T03:24:59Z-
dc.date.available2009-06-12T03:24:59Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationKorean J Pathol. 2008;42:87-93en
dc.identifier.issn1738-1843-
dc.identifier.issnhttp://www.pathology.or.kr-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.pathology.or.kr/04_JOURN/view.asp?jid=20080087-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/4545-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the reproducibility of both the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) or adenocarcinoma, and the histologic grading (HG) of endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC). METHODS: Ninety-three cases of EH or adenocarcinomas were reviewed independently by 21 pathologists of the Gynecologic Pathology Study Group. A consensus diagnosis was defined as agreement among more than two thirds of the 21 pathologists. RESULTS: There was no agreement on the diagnosis in 13 cases (14.0%). According to the consensus review, six of the 11 EH cases (54.5%) were diagnosed as EH, 48 of the 57 EC cases (84.2%) were EC, and 5 of the 6 serous carcinomas (SC) (83.3%) were SC. There was no consensus for the 6 atypical EH (AEH) cases. On the HG of EC, there was no agreement in 2 cases (3.5%). According to the consensus review, 30 of the 33 G1 cases (90.9%) were G1, 11 of the 18 G2 cases (61.1%) were G2, and 4 of the 4 G3 cases (100.0%) were G3. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus study showed high agreement for both EC and SC, but there was no consensus for AEH. The reproducibility for the HG of G2 was poor. We suggest that simplification of the classification of EH and a two-tiered grading system for EC will be necessary.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was partly supported by research fund of Chungnam National University in 2007.en
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherThe Korean Society of Pathology = 대한병리학회en
dc.subjectEndometrioid adenocarcinomaen
dc.subjectSerous carcinomaen
dc.subjectEndometrial hyperplasiaen
dc.titleA Multiinstitutional Consensus Study on the Pathologic Diagnosis of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Carcinomaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor서광선-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김인선-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박문향-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor안긍환-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor손진희-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박인애-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor윤혜경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김규래-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor안희정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김동완-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김미진-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor주희재-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김은경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최여희-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor유종우-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor최경은-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이상엽-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김혜선-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor홍성란-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이희정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이선-
dc.citation.journaltitleThe Korean Journal of Pathology (KJP) = 대한병리학회지-
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Pathology (병리학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_병리학전공)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse