Publications

Detailed Information

경사지게 식립된 임플랜트 모형에서 지대주를 인상용 코핑으로 이용한 새로운 인상법의 정확성 비교 연구 : Comparative accuracy of new implant impression technique using abutments as impression copings with an angulated implant model

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이혁재-
dc.contributor.author김창회-
dc.contributor.author임영준-
dc.contributor.author김명주-
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-01T06:06:34Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-01T06:06:34Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citation2008;46:2en
dc.identifier.issn0301-2875-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/47325-
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem: A new implant impression technique which use abutments as impression coping, and use resin cement as a splinting material was described. Accuracy of this technique was compared with conventional closed tray and resin splinted open tray technique for a angled 3-implant model Material and methods: A dental stone master model with 3 linearly positioned implant analogue and a reference framework which was passively fitted to it were fabricated. The center analogue was perpendicular to the plane of model and the outer analogues had a angulation forward or backward. 10 closed tray impressions, 10 resin splinted open tray impressions, 10 abutment-resin framework cementation impressions and 10 abutment-metal framework cementation impressions were made with additional silicone material and poured with dental stone. A light microscope with image processing was used to record the vertical gap dimension between reference framework and analogue of duplicated cast made with each 4 impression techniques. Statistical analysis used one-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests Tukey test of .05 level of significance Results: Significant difference in the vertical gap dimension was found between closed tray technique; 74.3 () and resin splinted open tray technique, and two other new technique. (P<.05) Abutment-metal framework cementation technique;42.5 () was significantly different from resin splinted open tray technique. (P<.05) Abutmentresin framework cementation technique;51.0 () did not differ significantly from resin splinted open tray technique;50.3 (). (P>.05) Conclusion: Within limitations of this study, the accuracy of implant level impressions of resin splinted open tray technique was superior to that of closed tray technique. A new technique using abutment and metal framework cementation was more accurate than resin splinted open tray technique.en
dc.language.isokoen
dc.publisher대한치과보철학회en
dc.subjectImplant impressionen
dc.subjectAngulationen
dc.subjectAbutmenten
dc.subjectCementationen
dc.title경사지게 식립된 임플랜트 모형에서 지대주를 인상용 코핑으로 이용한 새로운 인상법의 정확성 비교 연구en
dc.title.alternativeComparative accuracy of new implant impression technique using abutments as impression copings with an angulated implant modelen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share