Browse

The patientssatisfaction following implant treatment

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHeo, Yoon-Young-
dc.contributor.authorHeo, Seong-Joo-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Myung-Woo-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ji-Man-
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-01T09:58:37Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-01T09:58:37Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citation대한치과보철학회지 2008;46:569-576.en
dc.identifier.issn0301-2875-
dc.identifier.urihttp://uci.or.kr/G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200804748556322)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/47943-
dc.description.abstractSTATEMENT OF PROBLEM: While patient-centered outcomes are usually not reported, these may represent major aspects of the implant success for the patient. Use of a well-designed patient survey form can be an invaluable asset to the implant practitioners. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate patient satisfaction after implant therapy by means of a questionnaire. MATERIAL AND METHODS: South Korean patients (n = 100), who visited the dental examination center of Soon Chun Hyang university hospital, were asked to fill out the satisfaction questionnaire regarding aspects of cost, comfort, esthetics, chewing, gingival health, food impaction, phonetic aspect, screw loosening, and general satisfaction. Responses to statements were given on the Likert response scale. Four experimental groups of patients were distinguished with various location (), year (), number of implant replacements (), and treatment cost (). The reliability of the response scales was measured by calculation of its internal consistency, expressed as Cronbach's . The scales were distinguished by means of factor analysis method. Possible differences in scale scores among the groups were assessed by One-way ANOVA (= 0.05). RESULTS: Patients responded to most of the statements with high satisfaction. But the mean scale score of statement about cost was low. After the verification of internal consistency and factor analysis, five components, e.g. general satisfaction, comfort, chewing efficiency, esthetics, and phonetic aspect were grouped together. These components could be explained with common meaning and the first factor was named as 'general satisfaction'. Differences in patient satisfaction on the scale with esthetics were present between patients who have been wearing the implant prosthesis less than three years and those more than seven years (<). CONCLUSION: The patients were generally satisfied with the outcome of implant treatment. But the patients' major complaint was high cost and while the statistically significant difference was not shown, the satisfaction scale about food impaction and esthetics was low. So the continuing efforts to make improvements about these problems are needed for the implant practitioners.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisher대한치과보철학회en
dc.subjectDental implanten
dc.subjectPatient satisfactionen
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen
dc.subjectLikert scaleen
dc.subjectInternal consistencyen
dc.subjectFactor analysisen
dc.titleThe patientssatisfaction following implant treatmenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor허윤영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor허성주-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor장명우-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor박지만-
Appears in Collections:
College of Dentistry/School of Dentistry (치과대학/치의학대학원)Dept. of Dentistry (치의학과)Journal Papers (저널논문_치의학과)
Files in This Item:
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse