Publications

Detailed Information

Cephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion with the bionator

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Sug-Joon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jong-Tae-
dc.contributor.authorNahm, Dong-Seok-
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-01T10:04:40Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-01T10:04:40Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2001;119(6:)578-586.en
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/48061-
dc.description.abstractThe principal aims of this study were to find the cephalometric predictors for good treatment results of bionator therapy and to justify bionator therapy as an early phase I treatment for patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Forty subjects who had Class II Division 1 malocclusion and who were treated with the bionator were selected for this study. They were classified into a good treatment result group and a poor treatment result group in reference to the posttreatment molar relationship, posttreatment overbite and overjet, posttreatment profile, and existence of relapse. Thirty-one cephalometric variables were analyzed on the pretreatment lateral cephalograms by t-test to evaluate differences between the 2 groups. The variables that differed significantly were analyzed by discriminant analysis to assess their predictability. The study showed that horizontal growth pattern, close to normal anteroposterior relationship between the maxilla and mandible, upright mandibular incisor, and retrusive lower lip were important predictors for good results. In particular, protrusion of the lower lip was the most important factor for the determination of the treatment results. In addition, the treatment times were much shorter for patients with these good predictors. The present study supports the premise that bionator therapy can produce clinically stable and favorable results if the patients are appropriately selected with the use of these diagnostic criteria. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:578-86)en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.titleCephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion with the bionatoren
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor안석준-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김종태-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor남동석-
dc.identifier.doi10.1067/mod.2001.113408-
Appears in Collections:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Altmetrics

Item View & Download Count

  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Share