Browse

Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Bohyoung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kyoung Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kil Joong-
dc.contributor.authorMantiuk, Rafal-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hye-ri-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Young Hoon-
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02-
dc.date.available2010-04-02-
dc.date.issued2008-05-22-
dc.identifier.citationAJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 ;190(6):W342-50.en
dc.identifier.issn1546-3141 (Electronic)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/62373-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the effects of compressing source thin-section abdominal CT images on final transverse average-intensity-projection (AIP) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At reversible, 4:1, 6:1, 8:1, 10:1, and 15:1 Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 compressions, we compared the artifacts in 20 matching compressed thin sections (0.67 mm), compressed thick sections (5 mm), and AIP images (5 mm) reformatted from the compressed thin sections. The artifacts were quantitatively measured with peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and a perceptual quality metric (High Dynamic Range Visual Difference Predictor [HDR-VDP]). By comparing the compressed and original images, three radiologists independently graded the artifacts as 0 (none, indistinguishable), 1 (barely perceptible), 2 (subtle), or 3 (significant). Friedman tests and exact tests for paired proportions were used. RESULTS: At irreversible compressions, the artifacts tended to increase in the order of AIP, thick-section, and thin-section images in terms of PSNR (p < 0.0001), HDR-VDP (p < 0.0001), and the readers' grading (p < 0.01 at 6:1 or higher compressions). At 6:1 and 8:1, distinguishable pairs (grades 1-3) tended to increase in the order of AIP, thick-section, and thin-section images. Visually lossless threshold for the compression varied between images but decreased in the order of AIP, thick-section, and thin-section images (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Compression artifacts in thin sections are significantly attenuated in AIP images. On the premise that thin sections are typically reviewed using an AIP technique, it is justifiable to compress them to a compression level currently accepted for thick sections.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Roentgen Ray Societyen
dc.subjectAnatomy, Cross-Sectional/*methodsen
dc.subjectData Compression/*methods/standardsen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/*methodsen
dc.subjectRadiography, Abdominal/*methodsen
dc.subjectReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.subjectAlgorithms-
dc.subjectArtifacts-
dc.titleArtifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data setsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김보형-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이경호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김길중-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김혜리-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김영훈-
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.07.3405-
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Radiology (영상의학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_영상의학전공)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse