Browse

Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seung Ja-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Woo Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Nariya-
dc.contributor.authorCha, Joo Hee-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sun Mi-
dc.contributor.authorIm, Jung-Gi-
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T01:54:52Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-02T01:54:52Z-
dc.date.issued2007-12-22-
dc.identifier.citationRadiology. 2008 ;246(1):71-80.en
dc.identifier.issn1527-1315 (Electronic)-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://radiology.rsna.org/content/246/1/71.full.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10371/62411-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the sensitivity and reproducibility of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system applied to serial digital mammograms obtained in women with breast cancer, with histologic analysis as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved, and patient informed consent was waived. A commercially available CAD system was applied to initial and follow-up digital mammograms obtained in 93 women with breast cancer (mean age, 52 years; age range, 32-81 years). The mean interval between mammographic examinations was 23 days (range, 7-58 days). There were 119 visible lesion components (70 masses, 49 microcalcifications). Sensitivity, false-positive mark rate, and reproducibility of the CAD system were evaluated for both sets of mammograms with the t test. RESULTS: Sensitivities of the CAD system at initial and follow-up digital mammography were 91% and 89%, respectively, for detection of masses. Sensitivity of the CAD system for detection of microcalcifications was 100% at both initial and follow-up digital mammography. Overall false-positive mark rates were 0.29 per image and 0.27 per image at initial and follow-up digital mammography, respectively. When craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views were considered separately, sensitivities were 76% and 75%, respectively, for masses and 96% and 92%, respectively, for microcalcifications. The reproducibility of CAD marks was 80% for true-positive masses, 92% for true-positive microcalcifications, 9% for false-positive masses, and 8% for false-positive microcalcifications (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the CAD system was consistently high for detection of breast cancer on initial and short-term follow-up digital mammograms. Reproducibility was significantly higher for true-positive CAD marks than for false-positive CAD marks. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/246/1/71/DC1.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRadiological Society of North America (RSNA)en
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms/pathology/*radiographyen
dc.subject*Diagnosis, Computer-Assisteden
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMammography/*methodsen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subject*Radiographic Image Enhancementen
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.titleComputer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinationsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김승자-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor문우경-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor조나리야-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor차주희-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김선미-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor임정기-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.2461062072-
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Radiology (영상의학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_영상의학전공)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse