Browse

Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorBajpai, Vasundhara-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kyoung Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Bohyoung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kil Joong-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Jung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Young Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Heung Sik-
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-24T05:22:27Z-
dc.date.available2010-06-24T05:22:27Z-
dc.date.issued2008-07-24-
dc.identifier.citationAJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(2): W38-W43en
dc.identifier.issn1546-3141 (Electronic)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18647884-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ajronline.org/cgi/reprint/191/2/W38.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10371/67781-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to show the difference of Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 compression artifacts in the lung between thin- and thick-section CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five thin-section (1 mm) and 35 corresponding thick-section (5 mm) images were compressed to reversible and irreversible 4:1, 6:1, 8:1, 10:1, and 15:1. In each compressed image, pixels outside the lung were replaced with those from the original image. By comparing the compressed and original images, three radiologists independently rated the compression artifacts using grades of 0 (none, the two images were indistinguishable), 1 (image differences were barely perceptible), 2 (image differences were subtle), or 3 (image differences were significant). At each compression level, thin and thick sections were compared for peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) using paired t tests and for the readers' responses using Wilcoxon's signed rank tests and exact tests for paired proportions. RESULTS: Thin sections had smaller PSNR (p < 0.0001). Thin sections had higher grades of artifacts than thick sections, showing significant differences at compression levels of 10:1 (mean score, 0.8 vs 0.4, 0.9 vs 0.1, 0.3 vs 0.0; p < 0.009 for the three readers) and 15:1 (1.9 vs 1.0, 1.9 vs 1.1, 1.5 vs 0.6; p < 0.0001). The percentages of distinguishable pairs (grades 1-3) were greater for thin sections than for thick sections, showing a statistically significant difference at 10:1 for two readers (31% vs 3% and 74% vs 37%; p < 0.006). CONCLUSION: The lung shows more compression artifacts on thin sections than on thick sections. Section thickness should be taken into consideration when adjusting the compression level for lung CT images.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Roentgen Ray Societyen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen
dc.subjectAlgorithmsen
dc.subject*Artifactsen
dc.subjectData Compression/*methodsen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectLung Diseases/*radiographyen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMediastinum/radiographyen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisteden
dc.subject*Radiography, Thoracicen
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametricen
dc.subjectThoracic Wall/radiographyen
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed/*methodsen
dc.titleDifferences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT imagesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor이경호-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김보영-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김길중-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김태정-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor김영훈-
dc.contributor.AlternativeAuthor강흥식-
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.07.3350-
Appears in Collections:
College of Medicine/School of Medicine (의과대학/대학원)Radiology (영상의학전공)Journal Papers (저널논문_영상의학전공)
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
  • mendeley

Items in S-Space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse